Magnitude of electric field with square loop

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field generated by a square loop of charged wires. The loop consists of four identical wires, each with a linear charge density, and the goal is to find the electric field at a specific distance above the center of the loop. The equation provided simplifies the calculation, but there is uncertainty about the accuracy of the initial result obtained. Participants suggest using symmetry and trigonometry to combine the electric fields from each wire segment. Clarifications on variable definitions and comparisons with previous problems are also discussed to ensure understanding of the situation.
py208
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The square loop shown below is made up of four identical wires of length scripted l = 18 cm each charged with a linear density λ = 18 nC/m.

Find the magnitude of the electric field at a distance z = scripted l/2 above the center of the loop.

Homework Equations



Start by first simplifying the result from problem 21-46,
E = (2kλ)(L/x)(4x2 + L^2)^-1/2
where x = (z^2 + (L/2)^2)^1/2. Then make use of the symmetry of the situation.

The Attempt at a Solution



I used this equation to solve and got 335.53967, But I don't know what to do after this, or if this number is even right. Help please!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps you want to show a bit more. Not numbers, but what variables stand for. I suppose (what else can I do) that 21-46 asks for the electric field on the Perpendicular Bisector of a charged rod ? this link, example 2.3 works that out very nicely.

Does that check with your 21-46 result ?
It looks to me as if your z is his (/her) y

I think I see a difference, so I might misinterpret the situatiuon.

Anyway, it simplifies a lot if z = L/2.

The next step is to add the four ##\vec E## with simple trigoniometry.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top