Finding the potential V and electric field E

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the electric potential V and electric field E at a point P due to a line of linear charge density λ. The problem involves concepts from electrostatics, particularly the application of Coulomb's law and Gauss's law in the context of electric fields and potentials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration needed to find the potential V and the relationship between the electric field E and the potential. There are questions about the variables of integration and the correct application of formulas. Some participants suggest using Gauss's law and clarify the vector nature of the electric field.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's reasoning and clarifying points of confusion. There is recognition of the need for careful consideration of variables and integration limits, as well as the suggestion to use mathematical software for complex calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of correctly identifying the axes and limits of integration, as well as the distinction between the potential as a function of different variables. There is also mention of the challenges posed by the mathematical complexity of the problem.

Abdul.119
Messages
73
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Find the electric potential V and electric field E at the point P due to a line of linear charge density = λ
2dmdo1z.png

Homework Equations


24od669.png

E = (2kλ)/z

The Attempt at a Solution


Now I made these lines
34si5g3.jpg

If P is on the z axis, r' = x, but it's shifted, so r' = x-x', and r = z, so then | r - r' | = ((x-x')^2+z^2)^1/2
The dl' = λdx, and -L < x < L
So we use the equation V(r), where k and λ are constants, and integration is from -L to L
So V(z) = kλ ∫ dx / ((x-x')^2+z^2)^1/2 , from -L to L
Am I correct?

And as for the the E field, I think it's simply E = (2kλ)/z ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Abdul.119 said:
Am I correct?

And as for the the E field, I think it's simply E = (2kλ)/z ?
Your work on the potential is correct. For the field, you need to consider using Gauss law, almost the same as the integral you did for the potential where you need to consider the vector nature of field. The formula for the field you came up with there holds only for infinitely long rod.
 
Abdul.119 said:
So V(z) = kλ ∫ dx / ((x-x')^2+z^2)^1/2 , from -L to L
Am I correct?
Almost. What is the variable you're integrating with respect to? and BTW it's V(x,z), not just V(z).

And as for the the E field, I think it's simply E = (2kλ)/z ?
No, it's obviously a function of x and z.
Once you calculated V(x,z) you can get the E field how?
 
blue_leaf77 said:
Your work on the potential is correct. For the field, you need to consider using Gauss law, almost the same as the integral you did for the potential where you need to consider the vector nature of field. The formula for the field you came up with there holds only for infinitely long rod.
I don't see how Gauss's law applies here.
 
OMG, yes I made a reference mistake. I meant Coulomb's law, and the related integral over the rod's length.
 
rude man said:
Almost. What is the variable you're integrating with respect to? and BTW it's V(x,z), not just V(z).No, it's obviously a function of x and z.
Once you calculated V(x,z) you can get the E field how?

Integrate with respect to x, since the charges lie on the x axis

For the E field, I believe I should use dE = (kλdx z) / r^3 , and in our case the r = ((x-x')^2+z^2)^1/2
Or E = -del V
 
Last edited:
Abdul.119 said:
Integrate with respect to x, since the charges lie on the x axis
The charges are on the x' axis. Your answer had better include x, right? which won't happen if you integrate with respect to x, letting x = +L and -L as limits of integration. This might have been a typo on your part; the answer is the same other than winding up with V(x',z) instead of V(x,z).
For the E field, I believe I should use dE = (kλdx z) / r^3 , and in our case the r = ((x-x')^2+z^2)^1/2
Or E = -del V
E is a vector, so your first expression can't be right.
I do suggest the second one, though ...
Be prepared for some messy math, I suggest going to math software if you have access to it.
 
rude man said:
The charges are on the x' axis. Your answer had better include x, right? which won't happen if you integrate with respect to x, letting x = +L and -L as limits of integration. This might have been a typo on your part; the answer is the same other than winding up with V(x',z) instead of V(x,z).
E is a vector, so your first expression can't be right.
I do suggest the second one, though ...
Be prepared for some messy math, I suggest going to math software if you have access to it.

Yeah I will use mathematica to solve these. And thanks for clearing it up, I was a little confused on the integral, got it now. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
764
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K