Mass and velocity of virtual photon in Bhabha Scattering

JamesM86
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Determine the mass of the virtual photon in each of the lowest-order diagrams for Bhabha scattering (assume the electron and positron are at rest). What is its velocity? (Note that these answers would be impossible for real photons)

Note: You can "just write down" the answers or provide a more rigorous solution. The rigorous solution requires use of the relativistic invariant E2 - p2c2 = m2c4.)

Homework Equations



For real particles:
E2 - p2c2 = m2c4

The Attempt at a Solution



Two two feynman diagrams which I come up with are the same ones that are on wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhabha_scattering

I am EXTREMELY confused about the fundamental nature of this problem. I've been told that "energy and momentum" are conserved at each vertex. If that is the case, then for the annihilation diagram, I see no reason why the photon isn't real. For the "scattering" diagram, I suppose that the energy of the photon must equal the initial (and final) energy of the leptons. But even if you know that energy, how do you get a mass of the photon from it, if the above equation only applies to real particles?

Furthermore, in "4-momentum" (which I barely understand), if I somehow get the momentum of the virtual particle, how do I get its mass? Do I simply divide by c?

I've been racking my brain about this problem for days, and even spoke to the professor about it in person, and his explanation was wonky and not terribly helpful. And apparently nobody on the internet has ever tried to solve this type of problem, because I can't find anything anywhere on how to figure this out. Any help here would be amazing and extremely appreciated.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the annihilation diagram of bhabha scattering comprise of a time like photon while the simple one is having a spacelike part.use the general energy momentum conservation at vertex and use einstein formula to determine mass.for a real photon,the m is zero but not for virtual one.Also the diagram drawn on wiki page is not the usual way and in a awkward way it is wrong but it is still right if you don't follow the feynman usual way.
 
I know that the wikipedia diagrams aren't really correct because they label the antiparticles and have the arrows the wrong way, which isn't convention. But they're correct other than that, no?

So you're saying that, for the annihilation case, the energy of the virtual photon is equal to the total initial energy:

Ephoton = 2mec2

And since

E=mc2

The mass of the photon is therefore 2me

Is that right?
 
I am saying to use
E2=p2+m2
For annihilation diagram,you can best convert to CM system in which electrons and positrons move in opposite direction and resulting photon's momentum is zero.so in this frame
for photon,
E2=m2
and E=2(√P2+M2),WHERE P is CM system momentum of any electron or positron.now you can calculate photon mass.You can transform to lab frame after that in terms of original momentas.(mass is invariant of frame)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top