Mass Determination Using Torque and Equilibrium: A Meter Stick Experiment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the mass of a meter stick using torque and equilibrium principles without direct measurement. Participants suggest utilizing materials like washers and a pencil to create a system that balances forces and torques. The key equations involve ensuring net force and net torque equal zero to establish equilibrium. There is confusion regarding the application of kinematics versus the required focus on torque and equilibrium. The conversation emphasizes the need for a clear experimental setup to achieve the goal.
Master7731
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Purpose: Determine the mass of a meter stick without directly measuring it.

Possible Materials:
Select the appropriate materials you will use.

__ Meter Stick __ Thermometer __ Stop watch __ Washers __ Knife edge
__ Plastic ruler __ Known Masses __ String __ Pencil __ Metal/wooden rod
__ Marbles __ Cardboard pieces __ Sponge pad __ Sticky tape __ Elastics

You are not allowed to use a scale!



Homework Equations



How do i work this out?...im stuck

The Attempt at a Solution



I think from the conditions of mechanical equilibrium, Net Force = 0 and Net torque = 0 you could solve it... But I am not sure how...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would try to use the string the Washers and the pencil to somehow create a truck. I would put the meter stick on it and somehow give it a certain force ( like tie it with the metal rod) and count the time it needs to go some distance. Then I would repeat that replacing though the Meter stick with the known masses.
 
what? we ar supposed to use torque and equilibrium not kinematics
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top