Mass in Equilibrium with Variable Length Cable

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a 1000 kg block suspended in equilibrium by two cables, with one cable's length variable. Participants outline the constraints of equilibrium using the sum of forces in both the x and y directions, applying the law of cosines to establish relationships between the tensions in the cables. There is a challenge in solving the resulting equations, particularly concerning the angles derived from the law of cosines. Suggestions are made to redraw the free body diagram to clarify the angles and improve the solution approach. The overall sentiment reflects frustration with the complexity of the problem and the learning process.
srg
Gold Member
Messages
7
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Consider the diagram below. A 1000 kg block being suspended in equilibrium by cables c and a. Cable c is on a pulley which can vary the length of the cable. Write the constraints of equilibrium. Find the tension in each cable based on varying lengths of cable c between 1.2 m and 2.2 m.
http://srg.sdf.org/images/PF/MassVarLength.png

Homework Equations


Law of Cosines: c^2=a^2+b^2-2ab\cos{C}
Constraints of Equilibrium: \sum{F_x}=\sum{F_y}=0

The Attempt at a Solution


I drew a free body diagram:
http://srg.sdf.org/images/PF/VarLengthDiagram.png

I used the law of cosines to begin writing the constraints of equilibrium.
\sum{F_x}=0 \rightarrow T_c(\frac{b^2+c^2-a^2}{2bc})-T_b(\frac{a^2+b^2-c^2}{2ab})=0
\sum{F_y}=0 \rightarrow T_c\sin{\arccos{\frac{b^2+c^2-a^2}{2bc}}}+T_b\sin{\arccos{\frac{a^2+b^2-c^2}{2ab}}}-9810=0

Since everything is known except for T_c and Tb, they can be solved for. However, this system of equations doesn't seem easily solved for. I suspect I went wrong when I took the sin(arccos()), but I needed the sine of the angle when all I had was the law of cosines.

This course has been incredibly frustrating, and I'm only 5 weeks in. I'm beginning to feel I'm not really cut out for this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
As I read the problem statement, it sounds like the length AB is fixed at 1.0 m. Assuming this is correct, the geometry will change as the length BC changes.

In your attempt at a solution, you seem to have used the same expression for the for the cosine of the angle on both sides. Redraw the figure, in an unsymmetric form, and define the angles on both sides separately. See if this does not get you started.
 
Back
Top