Mass on a spring from equilibrium

Thread starter mancity
Start date Dec 22, 2023
Tags

Equilibrium Formula Spring

AI Thread Summary

The discussion centers on the use of the formula Fs = 1/2 kx^2 in relation to a mass on a spring and its equilibrium position. The confusion arises over why x is taken as 0.1m instead of 0.05m, given that 0.05m is the displacement from equilibrium. The key point is that the formula measures energy based on the spring's extension from its unstretched position, not from equilibrium. Therefore, x should represent the total extension from the unstretched state. Understanding this distinction clarifies the application of the formula in calculating spring energy.

Dec 22, 2023

mancity

Homework Statement: An object with mass m is suspended at rest from a spring with a spring constant of 200 N/m. The length of the spring is 5.0 cm longer than its unstretched length L, as shown above. A person then exerts a force on the object and stretches the spring an additional 5.0 cm. What is the total energy stored in the spring at the new stretch length?

Relevant Equations: Fs=1/2kx^2

Can someone explain that, when using the formula (Fs=1/2 kx^2) why do we use x=0.1m instead of 0.05m? Seems like a simple concept but why isn't it 0.05m (since 0.05m from equilibrium). Thanks.

Physics news on Phys.org

Dec 22, 2023

nasu

Homework Helper

If you use the formula ##E=\frac{1}{2}kx^2##, the reference for energy (zero energy) is the position with the spring unstretched. So, you need the extension of the spring relative to the unstretched position.

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

View full post »

Thread 'I've come across another fluid pressure problem I don't understand'

Neglect gravity other than that of water; neglect friction. F1=ρgsh=1000*10*1*(1+4)=50000 N; F1=ρgsh=1000*10*0.1*4=4000 N; F3=50000-4000=46000 N?

View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

View full post »