Mass Relation in a Three-Mass Pulley System: Solving for Unknown Masses

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the relationship between the masses in a three-mass pulley system, with the assumption that the pulleys are massless and frictionless. The initial equations set up by the participants indicate confusion about the forces acting on the masses and the correct relationships between them. It is clarified that if the rope is massless, then the relationship m2 = 2*m1 holds true, but if the rope has mass, additional considerations for tension must be made. The conclusion suggests that if the rope is not massless, the relationship changes, leading to the conclusion that m2 < 2*m1. The conversation highlights the importance of clarifying assumptions in physics problems.
IhasSwag
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the relation between the mass of block 1 and the mass of block 2. Assume that the pullies are massless and frictionless and that the rope is inelastic. All masses are unknown.
Possible answers: mblock2 = mblock1[/B]
mblock2 > mblock1
mblock2 < mblock1

The system below is at rest.
ch4_clip_image001_0013.gif


Homework Equations


F = mg = T

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm quite clueless on how to approach this problem, but this is how far I came.
m1*g - T1 = m1*a
m2*g - 0.5*T2 = m2*a

∑F = m1*a + m2*a = m1*g - T1 +m2*g - 0.5*T2

I'm not sure how to go any further.

Thanks in advance for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Focus on Pulley with block 2. Since the pulley is at rest, the sum of forces on that pulley equals zero.
 
So T1 + T3 - m2*g = 0 ?
m1*g + m3*g = m2*g
m1 + m3 = m2 ?
Am I approaching this problem the right way now?

I found out that I made a mistake in the possible answers. It should be:
mblock2 = 2*mblock1
mblock2 > 2*mblock1
mblock2 < 2*mblock1
 
The rope has the same tension throughout.
 
Yes correct. Now notice that the tension should be the same so ##T_1=T_3##.
 
If T1 = T3 then m1 = m3
This means that m2 = 2*m1 ?

But now I face another problem because according to my teacher, the answer should have been: m2 < 2*m1
 
Is the rope considered to be massless?
 
It doesn't state that the rope is massless, so I guess not.
 
I meant to say that the rope has mass
 
  • #10
If the rope is massless then what we did here is correct and your teach is wrong.

However, if the rope is NOT massless, then the tension forces ##T_1+T_3## have to lift the weight of the segment of rope that is attached to pulley 2, so it will be ##T_1+T_3=m_2g+m_rg## where m_r the mass of the rope along the circumference of pulley 2.
 
  • #11
The rope is indeed not massless.
Thank you very much for your help.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top