Mastering Coulomb's Law: Troubleshooting Sign and Distance Issues

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on troubleshooting sign and distance issues in applying Coulomb's Law to a physics problem involving two charges. The main equation used is F = k * |q1| * |q2| / r^2, where participants clarify how to handle the signs of the charges and the distances involved. A user initially struggles with equating forces and understanding the implications of distance on the net force. After some guidance, they successfully derive the correct position for a unit positive charge, concluding with a calculated distance of 29.142 cm. The thread emphasizes the importance of correctly applying signs and distances in Coulomb's Law calculations.
luap12
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement [http://img44.imageshack.us/img44/1104/58339946.jpg ][/URL]



2. Homework Equations [F=k*abs(q1)*abs(q2)/r^2]



3. I understand the equation, but I am having trouble with my signs and also how to include the distance in the equation. I know that the force can't be zero between the charges, and I think it has to be farthest away from the larger positive charge to make them equal to zero. The forces point in the same direction because they are opposite.]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider a point at a distance x from -q toward right, and find the forces on a unit positive charge due to two charges. Equate them to get the value of x.
 
I don't understand what you mean by that... I think I'm over-thinking this.
 
Force on unit positive charge due to -q at a distance x*1o^-2 m from it is...?
Force on unit positive charge due to 2q at a distance (10 + x)*10^-2 m is...?
Since net force is zero, equate them to find x.
 
Thanks very much, I got it now.

((k*q)/x^2)-((k*2q)/(x+10)^2)=0, solving for x gives 24.142cm. Accounting for the distance of 5cm on the x-axis give the point to be 29.142cm. This was the correct answer. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top