Material coursework- young modulus of copper

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the Young's modulus of copper by determining stress and strain through experimental data. A significant issue arises from large error bars due to minimal wire extension, leading to unreliable gradient calculations on the graph. Participants highlight the importance of identifying the linear elastic deformation region and suggest that insufficient precision in measurements may render the results less useful. The user struggles with averaging gradients, as some values are negative, complicating the analysis. Clarification on the coursework level is requested to provide more tailored assistance.
roserose
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


find the young modulus of copper through calculating the stress and strain, plotting on a graph and finding
the gradient of the linear part of the graph

Homework Equations


ym=stress/strain
stress=force/ area
strain= extension/length


The Attempt at a Solution


having spent several lessons streching a piece of wire i came to drawin my graphs.
However as the ruler has mm markings and the wire only stretched by a couple of mm's i have really really large error bars on my graph. (about 50% near the bottom).

These have streched the gradient so that it is nearly infinate. The maximum gradient is less than th average gradient and the minimum gradient is negative.

HELP!


the graph looks a bit like this:
----
-----------
--------------------
------------------------------------
-------------------(0,0)------------------
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Well as I recall you need to identify the area of the curve that you were experiencing linear elastic deformation. As you stretch the wire then your cross sectional area shrinks and so on and so on until you are into the region of plastic deformation.

Here is a lecture that covers this in some detail with a practical demonstration. Perhaps it will help.


As to your data problem it may be that the experiment and measurements were set up without sufficient precision such that your results may not be all that useful, insofar as you didn't get enough data in the region where there is elastic deformation and too many of your data points are into plastic deformation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
My graph looks crazy even with just the elastic values. It looked how i expected it would until i added the uncertainty bars.

Because at first the wire only stretched a couple of mm ,the uncertainty was really high- about 50%, however as the extension increased the error decreased hence the pyramid shape.
My main Problem is finding the average gradient and the range of gradients for this pyramid ,as inevitably the gradient of one side is negative.
For example on one of my graphs i found these results:
average gradient= 437MPa
steepest gradient= -1.5MPa
shallowest Gradient= 1.5 MPa
 
Hi, Just to get the correct context of this coursework, this sounds to me like an AS level assignment. Please could you clarify this. Also, From the Described Experiment, to me, it sounds like you are possibly doing the 'OCR Advancing Physics B' Specification. Is this correct? (It is easier to provide help for you if you state the level you are working at).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top