Engineering (material science) Fatigue life prediction using integral

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on clarifying the calculation of delta sigma in fatigue life prediction using integrals. The user distinguishes between scenarios involving tensile and compressive stresses versus two tensile stresses, questioning the correct interpretation of delta sigma in each case. It is noted that for tensile and compressive stresses, delta sigma equals the tensile stress, while for two tensile stresses, it is the difference between maximum and minimum tensile stresses. The user seeks confirmation on the calculation of critical crack length, emphasizing the importance of using the largest tensile stress. Overall, the conversation highlights the nuances in applying fatigue life prediction formulas in different stress scenarios.
Pipsqueakalchemist
Messages
138
Reaction score
20
Homework Statement
I have question and solutions pictures below
Relevant Equations
Pictures of equations posted below
1670550617852.png

1670550641066.png

1670550663177.png

So for this question, I understand the math but just wanted to be clear on a few things. So I had this question on my midterm but instead of tensile and compressive stresses, it was tensile and tensile stress. I initially thought that the delta sigma in the integral was the maximum stress so in the example 100 MPa. But I believe my professor said that if it's tensile and compression then delta sigma is just equal to the tensile stress, but if it's tensile and tensile then the delta sigma would be max tensile - min tensile. And of course to find critical crack length I would use the largest tensile stress. I just wanted to make sure that this was correct because I ask my professor awhile ago and can't be 100% sure if this was correct, so please can someone confirm if I'm correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In your example, in my judgment, ##\Delta \sigma## should be 150 MPa.
 
Back
Top