Mathematica - how to simplify an output formula

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying a complex output formula in Mathematica, where the user has attempted using both the Simplify and FullSimplify functions without success. The provided formula involves multiple variables, including GG, v45, MSR, t, and s, which the user wishes to keep as unknowns. Other users are encouraged to share code or methods that might effectively simplify the expression. The conversation highlights the challenges of simplifying intricate mathematical expressions in Mathematica. Ultimately, the goal is to find a more efficient way to achieve a simplified output.
Safinaz
Messages
255
Reaction score
8
Mathematica -- how to simplify an output formula

Hi all,

Is there any more options to simplify an out put Mathematica formula. I used //Simplify but the expression still
complicated and //FullSimplify too slow and didn't work.

Bests,
Safinaz
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Please provide your code.
 
Hi,
Here is that:1/s^2 266.428 GG^4 (-1. MSR^4 + s (1.69 - 1. t) -
1. (-1.69 + t) (-1.69 + t) +
MSR^2 (-3.38 + 2. t)) + (-8.5683 MSR^8 +
s^3 (3.62011 - 2.14208 t) +
MSR^6 (74.2122 + 8.5683 s + 24.6339 t) +
s^2 (-71.8863 - 5.43016 t - 5.89071 t^2) -
3.74863 (61.6102 - 3.38 t + t^2) (2.8561 - 3.38 t + t^2) -
7.49726 s (-1.69 + t) (26.5209 - 2.43421*10^-16 t + t^2) +
MSR^4 (-2.14208 s^2 + s (-66.0669 - 29.4535 t) -
27.3115 (0.639919 + t) (4.46322 + t)) +
MSR^2 (s^2 (7.24021 + 12.8525 t) +
14.9945 (-1.69 + t) (19.1767 + 4.34571 t + t^2) +
s (177.421 + 86.8826 t + 23.5628 t^2)))/((1.69 -
1. t)^2 (1.69 + 2. MSR^2 - 1. s -
1. t)^2 v45^4) + (GG^2 (-1383.72 + 71.6685 MSR^6 +
MSR^4 (-242.24 - 35.8343 s - 143.337 t) +
s^2 (-60.5599 - 35.8343 t) + 1637.54 t - 484.479 t^2 -
35.8343 s (-1.69 + t) (11.83 + t) +
MSR^2 (71.6685 (-1.69 + t) (11.83 + t) +
s (242.24 + 143.337 t))))/(s (1.69 - 1. t) (-1.69 -
2. MSR^2 + s + t) v45^2)

Where GG, v45, MSR,t , s are free varibles I 'd like to leave them as unknowns.

Safinaz
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top