Mathematical problem from the course of reactor physics

phys_g
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,

This problem is from "Elementary Introduction to Nuclear Reactor Physics" by Liverhant,
I will be thankful for any help,because I'm really stuck on it :(
------------------------
(6-11)Calculate the smallest value of A for which the maximum fractional energy loss can be approximated by 4/A to within an error of 1%.
------------------------
the ans. should be 200.

------------------------

the relevant equation is:

\ <br /> ( \frac{\Delta E }{E0} )max.=\frac{4}{A} -\frac{8}{A^{2}}+\frac{12}{A^{3}}-\frac{16}{A^{4}}+...<br /> = (\frac{4}{A})(1-\frac{2}{A}+\frac{3}{A^{2}}-...)<br /> <br />

it looks easy but I couldn't get the right answer...
I tried to differentiate this eq. then equate the outcome with zero (to get the smallest value of A), but also I might need to study the series convergence (the radius of convergence must take the value of 1% ...right?)..I'm confused and don't know how to start..because non of these ideas got me the right answer.

I'll appreciate it if anyone can help me in solving this problem either analytically or numerically.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The series is alternating in sign and the terms are decreasing in magnitude. An error bound for such alternating series is that if S is the sum of the whole series with terms a_i, and S_k is the sum of the first k terms, then |S-S_k|<=|a_{k+1}|.
 
Thanks Dick!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top