Matrix exponential and applying it a random state

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of matrix exponentials, specifically the expression $$e^{-Kt}|\psi\rangle$$ and its validity when $$|\psi\rangle$$ is not an eigenvector of the matrix K. It is established that the expression $$\langle \psi | e^{-Kt} |\psi\rangle$$ does not equal $$e^{-\langle \psi | K |\psi\rangle t}$$. The correct interpretation involves expanding the state $$|\psi\rangle$$ in terms of the eigenstates of the operator $$\hat{K}$$, leading to the conclusion that the expectation value is given by a sum over the eigenstates, not a simple exponential of the expectation value of K.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix exponentials in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with eigenstates and eigenvalues of operators
  • Knowledge of Taylor series expansion
  • Basic concepts of quantum state representation (kets and bras)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of matrix exponentials in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about eigenvalue decomposition and its applications
  • Explore Taylor series expansions in the context of operators
  • Investigate the implications of non-eigenvector states in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, mathematicians specializing in linear algebra, and students studying quantum mechanics who seek to deepen their understanding of matrix operations and their implications in quantum states.

td21
Gold Member
Messages
177
Reaction score
8
Let K be any Matrix, not necessarily the hamitonian. Is $$e^{-Kt}\left|\psi\right>$$ equal to $$e^{-K\left|\psi\right>t}$$ even if it is not the the eigenvector of K?

I think so as i just taylor expand the $$e^{-Kt}$$ out but I want to confirm.

In that case can i say that $$\left<\psi\right|e^{-Kt}\left|\psi\right>$$ = $$e^{-\left<\psi\right|K\left|\psi\right>t}$$?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
td21 said:
Let K be any Matrix, not necessarily the hamitonian. Is $$e^{-Kt}\left|\psi\right>$$ equal to $$e^{-K\left|\psi\right>t}$$ even if it is not the the eigenvector of K?
I'm not sure this is formally correct, as it looks weird. The product of an operator on a ket should give back a ket, not the exponential of a ket (whatever that is).

td21 said:
In that case can i say that $$\left<\psi\right|e^{-Kt}\left|\psi\right>$$ = $$e^{-\left|\psi\right|K\left|\psi\right>t}$$?
This is definitely not correct. Considering that you can expand ##|\psi\rangle## in terms of the eigenstates of ##\hat{K}##,
$$
|\psi\rangle = \sum_k c_k |k \rangle
$$
with
$$
\hat{K} |k \rangle = k |k \rangle
$$
then
$$
e^{-\hat{K}t} |\psi\rangle = \sum_k c_k |k \rangle e^{-k t}
$$
so
$$
\langle \psi | e^{-\hat{K}t} |\psi\rangle = \sum_k \left|c_k\right|^2 e^{-k t} \neq e^{-\langle \psi | \hat{K} |\psi\rangle t}
$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K