Matrix of Linear Transformations

newtomath
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
L: R^2=>R^2 is defined by L(x,y)= (x+2y), (2x-y)

let S be the natural basis for R^2 and T=(-1,2), (2,0). T is another basis for R^2.

Find the matrix representing L with respect to

A) S
B) S and T
C) T and S
D) T
E) Compute L
L(1,2)
using the definition of L and also the matrices obtained in a,b,c,d.


I am pretty lost here. I plugged in 1,0 0,1 for the natural basis, solving for part A. plugged in T=(-1,2), (2,0) to solve for part C. Is this correct? Any ideas on the rest?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what you mean by "plugging in 1, 0, 0, 1" but you can get the matrix representing a linear transformation from a vector space with a given basis, to a vector space with another basis, by applying the linear transformation to each basis vector in the domain space in turn and writing the result in terms of the basis for the range space. The coefficients will be a column in the matrix.

For example, you are told that L(x,y)= (x+2y), (2x-y) so L(1, 0)= ((1+ 0),(2- 0)= (1, 2) and L(0,1)= (0+2(1), 2(0)- 1)= (2, -1). Since (1, 2)= 1(1, 0)+ 2(0,1) and (2, -1)= 2(1, 0)+ (-1)(0, 1) those are the columns of the matrix for (A).

(B) asks for the matrix with respect to "S and T". Again, we have L(1, 0)= (1, 2) and L(0,1)= (2, -1). Now, we need to write those results in terms of basis T: find a and b so that a(-1, 2)+ b(2, 0)= (1, 2) and c and d so that c(-1, 2)+ d(2, 0)= (2, -1). a and b will be the values for the first column and c and d for the second column.

(C) asks for the reverse of that. L(-1, 2)= (-1+ 2(2), 2(-1)- 2)= (-3, -4) and L(2, 0)= (2+ 2(0),2(2)- 0)= (2, 4) and those are already written in terms of basis S.

(D) Knowing that L(-1, 2)= (-3, -4) and L(2, 0)= (2, 4), write them in terms of basis T. Find a and b so that a(-1, 2)+ b(2, 0)= (-3, -4) and c and d so that c(-1, 2)+ b(2, 0)= (2, 4).
 
Thanks Hall, that was very clear. By pluggin in I meant using the vectors in the transformations.

Just to clarify, in part C "L(-1, 2)= (-3, -4)' did you mean (3,-4)?

Thanks
 
Can you shed some light on how to evaluate part E?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top