Max Height for Steel Wire: .5kg Object

Physics2013
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object of mass .5 kg is hung from the end of a steel wire 2m in length and .5mm in diameter. The mass is lifted a distance h and then dropped (creating a 'jerk') What is the largest value of h if you don't want the wire to break?
Ultimate Strength: 1.1E9 N/m^2
Young's Modulus: 2E11n N/m^2
g=9.8 m/s^2
A=Pi(r^2) = Pi(0.0625) mm^2 = Pi(6.25E-5) m^2

Homework Equations


F = -kx = ma
h=mgLo/AY
k= -AY/Lo

The Attempt at a Solution


I know the ultimate strength may not be exceed w/o wire breaking. So
Force(down) < or = 2E11 N/m^2

But, I am unsure of what the force(down) would be with the given information.
Force(down)=mgh ?
= (AY/Lo) x , where x=2h ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When the object reaches the bottom of the wire (2m below the hang point), it's going to start stretching the wire. You can think of the stretching wire as a spring. How far it stretches depends on how fast the object is moving when the wire starts to stretch, and that in turn depends on how high the object was dropped from.

So one way to solve this problem would be to consider it in two parts: first figure out how fast the object is going when it reaches the end of the wire, then figure out from that how far the spring stretches. (Alternatively, it is possible to solve the problem without explicitly finding the speed of the object)

If you've ever solved a problem that involved calculating the lowest height reached by a bungee jumper, you'll find that this is nearly the same thing.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top