Max Height of Stone on Spring: 51.2 cm

  • Thread starter Thread starter FlukeATX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum height a 7.9 kg stone can reach after being pushed down on a spring and released. The spring constant is determined to be 774.2 N/m based on the stone's weight and the initial compression. The velocity of the stone at the point of release is calculated to be approximately 3.17 m/s, leading to a maximum height of 51.2 cm. An alternative approach using energy conservation is suggested, emphasizing the relationship between gravitational potential energy and spring energy. The calculations and concepts presented seem to align well with the physics principles involved.
FlukeATX
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The figure shows an 7.9 kg stone at rest on a spring. The spring is compressed 10 cm by the stone. The stone is then pushed down an additional 32 cm and released. To what maximum height (in cm) does the stone rise from that position?


Homework Equations


k = mg/d
v = sqrt((kx^2)/m)
h = ((1/2)(v^2))/(g)



The Attempt at a Solution


So this is what I've tried:
k = mg/d
k = (7.9)(9.8) / (.1)
k = 774.2 N/m

v = sqrt((kx^2)/m)
v = sqrt((774.2*.32^2)/(7.9))
v = sqrt(79.27808/7.9)
v = 3.1678

h = (1/2v^2) / (g)
h = (1/2)(10.0352) / (9.8)
h = .512m
h = 51.2cm

Does this seem correct? I only have one shot left on the wiley plus and don't want to risk it if it's wrong. Appreciate the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't like the look of it! I don't think the mass will be moving when it reaches its maximum height, so no use calculating any speeds.

Seems to me you should be thinking in terms of energy.
gravitational potential energy + spring energy = constant.
mgh + 1/2k*x^2 = constant.
It shouldn't matter what reference level you use for the height, but for the extension it must be right. Would that be the initial level before the push, or before the stone is put on the spring?
 
I would consider the total potential of when the stone was released as my starting point. (This would treat x as the distance below the relaxed spring point and y as the distance above the relaxation point. And relaxed point is where the spring would have no weight at all.)

Then you can say from conservation of energy that

1/2*k*x2 = m*g*x + m*g*y + 1/2*k*y2

You know x from 10 + 32 cm and you know k as you have found already.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top