Maximise profit knowing manufacturing data

prehisto
Messages
111
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, this is my data and problem.
http://[ATTACH=full]200209[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]200210[/ATTACH]

[h2]Homework Equations[/h2][h2]The Attempt at a Solution[/h2]
So I am thinking that I can use system of equation to get the number of tables and closets for given resources.
0,2x+0,1y=40
0,1x+0,3y=60
1,2x+1,5y=371,4
But this does not include that profit from closets are bigger than from tables.. how can i include that?
 

Attachments

  • PLAIN]%20[Broken].png
    PLAIN]%20[Broken].png
    20.3 KB · Views: 168
  • 2njbyhj.png
    2njbyhj.png
    20.2 KB · Views: 167
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I have another Idea , maybe I can solve ir using Simplex method.
0,2x+0,1y<=40
0,1x+0,3y<=60
1,2x+1,5y<=371,4

and maximize 6x+8y ?
 
prehisto said:
I have another Idea , maybe I can solve ir using Simplex method.
0,2x+0,1y<=40
0,1x+0,3y<=60
1,2x+1,5y<=371,4

and maximize 6x+8y ?
Yes, but do not forget the conditions x>=0, y>=0. Also, it has only 2 variables, so can be solved graphically.
 
Ray Vickson said:
Yes, but do not forget the conditions x>=0, y>=0. Also, it has only 2 variables, so can be solved graphically.
Thanks .
it seems that graphically is not such a good idea because of the scale of graphs.
Although it seems that it will be nasty, I will try to do it numerically by pivot point method ( if it is the correct notation).
 
prehisto said:
Thanks .
it seems that graphically is not such a good idea because of the scale of graphs.
Although it seems that it will be nasty, I will try to do it numerically by pivot point method ( if it is the correct notation).
The graphical method works perfectly well when used as intended: it gives you the information about which two of the five inequalities are equalities at the optimum. Then you have two equations in two unknowns to solve, and doing that gives the exact solution. (The 5 inequalities are the 3 functional inequalities and the two non-negativity conditions.)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top