Maximizing Brick Stability: Solving the Brick Torque Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter bcjochim07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on maximizing the stability of a stack of four identical bricks while ensuring the top brick does not overhang the edge of the table. The key concept is torque and the center of mass, which must remain above the supporting bricks to prevent the stack from falling. Each brick's position affects the overall stability, with the critical condition being that the center of mass of any subset of bricks must align above the brick below it. The mathematical relationship between the positions of the bricks is essential for determining how far the top brick can extend without tipping over. Ultimately, the problem is framed as a mathematical challenge involving torque and balance.
bcjochim07
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Your task in a science contest is to stack four identical uniform bricks, each of length L, so that the top brick is as far to the right as possible without the stack falling over. Is it possible, as the figure shows, to stack the bricks such that no part of the top brick is over the table?
ablocks.jpg


Homework Equations


Torque=rFt


The Attempt at a Solution



I think this is a torque question. However, since it is a stack of blocks I can't figure how to go about summing up the torques. Any hints would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's more a center of mass problem. The top N bricks won't flip if their center of mass is not outside the N+1'st brick. This needs to be true for all the N up to the total number of bricks.
 
I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. Could you explain a little bit more?
 
If you have one brick on the edge of a table, it will fall if its center of mass is not above the table. If more than half of the brick is above the table, the force of gravity will produce a torque around the axis along the edge of the table that will keep the brick pressed against the table. If less than half of the brick is on the table, the center of mass isn't above the table, and the force of gravity will produce a torque that will make the brick fall of the table.
If the center of mass is exactly above the edge of the table, the torque will be 0.
The same goes for a brick that is on top of another brick. And it also goes for a stack of N bricks on top of another brick. The critical value for falling/not falling is when the center of mass of the N bricks is exactly above the edge of the brick below it.
This goes for the top brick of a stack, for the 2 top bricks, etc.
suppose the x coordinates of the middle of the bricks of a stack of N bricks are x_1 ... x_N (x_1 is the top brick). suppose the length of a brick is 1.
since the top brick must not fall its center of mass at x_1 can be at most x_2 + 1/2. The critical value occurs for x_1 = x_2 + 1/2
since the top 2 bricks must not fall their center of mass (x_1 + x_2)/2 can be at most x_3+1/2 etc. this must be true for each substack at the bottom of the complete stack.
You can think of the table as brick N+1 at position x_(N+1) = 0. The big question is, how big can x_1 get?
This is mainly a math problem
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top