Maximizing Rotational Motion Energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two blocks connected by a string over a pulley, with considerations of rotational motion, energy conservation, and friction. The context includes calculating the speed of the blocks after a certain distance has been traveled, using energy methods.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of conservation of energy principles, questioning how friction affects the energy calculations. There are attempts to formulate equations involving kinetic energy, potential energy, and work done by friction.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on energy conservation and the role of friction. There is a mix of confusion and attempts to clarify the relationships between different energy components and their placement in equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the correct formulation of energy equations and the impact of friction on the system. There are mentions of missing variables and the need for clarity on the definitions of terms used in the equations.

preluderacer
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the figure, two blocks, of masses 2 kg and 3 kg, are connected by a light string which passes over a pulley of moment of inertia 4.00 E-3 kg m m and radius 0.05 m. The coefficient of friction for the table top is 0.30. The blocks are released from rest. Using energy methods, one can calculate that after the upper block has moved 0.6 m, its speed is:



The Attempt at a Solution



I don't even know where to start with this problem. A little guidance will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi preluderacer! :wink:

use conservation of energy (KE + PE = constant),

remembering that the speeds of the two blocks, and of the rim of the pulley, will be the same …

what do you get? :smile:
 
where does the friction force come into the equation?
 
It shows up as energy lost. So E1=E2+friction (where E1 & E2 are mechanical energies). And how would you figure out how much energy was lost to friction over that distance?
 
Last edited:
what i got is this (1/2)(I)(v/r)^2=(1/2)mv^2 - friction?
 
hi preluderacer! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
preluderacer said:
what i got is this (1/2)(I)(v/r)^2=(1/2)mv^2 - friction?

no, not friction but work done by friction (and don't forget gravity) :wink:
 
im so confused is it then (1/2)mv2=(1/2)I(a/v)2+mu(d)+mgh?
 
preluderacer said:
im so confused is it then (1/2)mv2=(1/2)I(a/v)2+mu(d)+mgh?

(have a mu: µ and an omega: ω :wink:)

yes, except two items are on the wrong side, aren't they?

and ω isn't a/v, and your µ is missing an N, and d = … ? :smile:
 
mgh+Nµ+(1/2)mv^2=(1/2)I(v/r)^2? I am so I am so confuded
 
  • #10
just think logically :wink:

should the final KE of the two objects be on the same side or opposite sides?

should increasing h increase or decrease the final KE?

should increasing µN increase or decrease the final KE? :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K