Maximum charge on the plates of a capacitor

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum charge on the plates of a capacitor using Faraday's Law and circuit analysis. The derived formula for maximum charge, q_max, is found to be negative, which raises a question about its physical significance. The calculations involve integrating the electromotive force and applying Kirchhoff's loop rule, leading to the conclusion that the upper plate should be positively charged while the lower plate is negatively charged. Participants are prompted to verify the correctness of the solution and the choice of the surface area vector in the magnetic flux calculation. The overall inquiry centers on the implications of obtaining a negative maximum charge value.
lorenz0
Messages
151
Reaction score
28
Homework Statement
A square circuit of side ##a=10cm## with a resistance ##R=1k\Omega## and a capacitor ##C=100nF## is in a region of space where there is a ##\vec{B}## field perpendicular to circuit, pointing inward, which changes according to ##\frac{dB}{dt}=-0.01 T/s##
Find the maximum charge on the plates of the capacitor and which plate is going to be positively charged and which one is going to be negatively charged.
Relevant Equations
##\oint_{\Gamma}\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l}=-\frac{d\phi(\vec{B})}{dt}##
What I have done:

The electromotive force due to Faraday's Law is: ##\mathcal{E}=-\frac{d\phi(\vec{B})}{dt}=\frac{d}{dt}(Ba^2)=a^2\frac{dB}{dt}=-10^{-4}V.##
In the circuit, going around the loop in a clockwise fashion:
##\oint_{\Gamma}\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l}=-\frac{d\phi(\vec{B})}{dt}\Rightarrow iR+\frac{q}{C}=\mathcal{E}\Rightarrow \frac{dq}{dt}R+\frac{q}{C}=\mathcal{E}\Rightarrow \frac{dq}{dt}=-\frac{q-C\mathcal{E}}{RC}##
##\Rightarrow \int_{0}^{q}\frac{d\bar{q}}{\bar{q}-C\mathcal{E}}=-\int_{0}^{t}\frac{d\bar{t}}{RC}\Rightarrow [\ln(\bar{q}-C\mathcal{E})]_{0}^{q}=-\frac{t}{RC}\Rightarrow \ln\left(-\frac{q}{C\mathcal{E}}+1\right)=-\frac{t}{RC}\Rightarrow q(t)=C\mathcal{E}(1-e^{-\frac{t}{RC}})## so ##q_{max}=C\mathcal{E}=\left(100\cdot 10^{-9}\cdot (-10^{-4})\right) C=-10^{-11} C##.

Since the current goes around in a clockwise fashion, the upper plate should be charge positively and the bottom one negatively.

Now, I have a doubt: does it make sense that ##q_{max}## comes out negative?

Other than that, is my solution correct? Thanks
 

Attachments

  • circuit.png
    circuit.png
    6.4 KB · Views: 155
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember: ##\Phi=\int \vec B \cdot d\vec S##. How did you choose ##d\vec S##? Check signs
 
Gordianus said:
Remember: ##\Phi=\int \vec B \cdot d\vec S##. How did you choose ##d\vec S##? Check signs
##\phi=\int_{S}\vec{B}\cdot d\vec{S}## and since ##\vec{B}## is pointing inside the page and the area is oriented with the normal pointing away from the page this becomes ##\int_{S}(-B)dS=-B\int_{S}dS=-Ba^2## so ##\mathcal{E}=-\frac{d}{dt}\phi=-\frac{d}{dt}(-Ba^2)=a^2\frac{dB}{dt}.##
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
869
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K