Maximum Kinetic Energy of a Particle with Force F = F0e^(–kx)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kiowaviator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum kinetic energy of a particle subjected to a force defined by F = F0e^(–kx). The participant successfully applies the Work-Kinetic Energy theorem, recognizing that the work done (W) equals the change in kinetic energy (Kf - Ki), with the particle starting from rest at x = 0. They derive the work done by integrating the force over the distance, ultimately simplifying to W = F0(1/k). The conclusion is reached by multiplying F0 with 1/k, confirming the maximum kinetic energy expression. The participant expresses gratitude for the clarification that helped them finalize their understanding.
kiowaviator
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
This question is whooping me. I know I have the calculus part right I just don't know where to go from here?

A particle moving along the x-axis is acted upon by a single force F = F0e^(–kx), where F0 and k are constants. The particle is released from rest at x = 0. It will attain a maximum kinetic energy of

F0/k
F0/e^(k)
kF0
1/2(kF0)^2
ke^(k)F0

So using the Work Kinetic Energy theorem
W=Kf-Ki since x=0 then Kf=W

W=integral(F = F0e^(–kx),x,0,xf)
taking F0 out, since its a constant, and integrating the exponential function I get
W=F0[-e^(-kxf)/k + 1/k]

now what?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you evaluate the integral one of the terms is zero,

exp(-x) goes to zero as x goes to infinity?
 
I did that, that's why the second term inside the brackets is 1/k, since e^(-k*0)=1.
 
You've pretty much done it now. So you now have 1/k inside the bracket and f0 outside the bracket, so just multiply them together to get the answer.
 
Ok, that makes sense. I was there I just couldn't see it. Thanks all.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top