Maxwell Boltzmann distribution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the number of mercury atoms in the ground (n=1) and first-excited (n=2) states using the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution at a temperature of 1600K. The energy difference between these states is given as 4.86 eV, and it is noted that the statistical weights for both states are assumed to be equal. However, there is confusion regarding the application of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, as it primarily deals with atom velocities rather than energy states. Participants clarify that the relevant factor for determining the populations of the two states is the energy difference and not the statistical weights. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in terminology when discussing statistical weights in relation to the Boltzmann factor.
vincisonfire
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The energy difference between the first excited state of mercury and the ground state is 4.86 eV.
(a) If a sample of mercury vaporized in a flame contains 10^20
atoms in thermal equilibrium at 1600K, calculate the number of atoms in the n=1 (ground) and n=2 (first-excited) states. (Assume the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution applies and that the n=1 and n=2 states have equal statistical weights.)

Homework Equations


Maxwell Boltzmann Distribution

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought that since they have the same statistical weight, there must be 5*10^19 particles in each state. But I don't think it is the good answer since we use this number for another exercice and it doesn't yield the good answer.
I don't know how to figure out these number using Maxwell Boltzmann distribution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maxwell-Boltzmann refers to the distributions of atom velocities and is not relevant here.

What are relative populations of 2 states, separated by energy ΔE and at a temperature T?
 
"Statistical weight" refers to the number of different states there are with n=1 and n=2, respectively. In reality the statistical weight is certainly not the same for these states, but never mind: all you need is the energy difference between the two states, and then answer Redbelly's question.

[It's a bit unfortunate that *sometimes* by "statistical weight" one means exactly the Boltzmann factor you will have to calculate: so by that definition you are correct to say the populations in the states are equal. But clearly, the person who phrased the question did not have that meaning of "statistical weight" in mind.]
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top