Maxwell's 4th equation. BUT, curl of H is zero everywhere

  • Thread starter Thread starter ugenetic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curl Zero
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of Maxwell's 4th equation, focusing on the curl of the magnetic field H in relation to current density. Participants explore the implications of using Wolfram Alpha to analyze the curl of specific vector fields, noting that the curl of H outside a wire should be zero. It is emphasized that the current distribution I(r) must be continuous and not concentrated at a singular point for accurate results. The conversation highlights that the curl of H will yield a current density j, particularly when considering distributions like a Gaussian. Ultimately, the discussion clarifies that while the curl of H can be zero in air, this scenario is idealized and may not reflect real-world conditions.
ugenetic
Messages
49
Reaction score
3
please go to "Wolfram Alpha" website, (google the term) and copy paste the following formula:

curl ( (-y/(x^2+y^2), x/(x^2+y^2), 0)

you can see the result is zero

I think that's the expression of H surrounding a current. what am I missing?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Try this:

curl ( I(Sqrt(x^2+y^2)) (-y/(x^2+y^2), x/(x^2+y^2), 0) / (2 Pi) )

Where I(r) = I(Sqrt(x^2+y^2)) represents the current flowing within radius r.
 
I don't think your equation was correct. and I think curl of H outside of the wire SHOULD be zero. it should be I / Sqrt (x2 + y2) and x direction's expression should be -y/ sqrt(x2 + y2)
 
Can you provide more information regarding the question?
 
ugenetic said:
I don't think your equation was correct. and I think curl of H outside of the wire SHOULD be zero. it should be I / Sqrt (x2 + y2) and x direction's expression should be -y/ sqrt(x2 + y2)

My suggestion was to assume a current distribution I(r) that is not concentrated on x=y=0, but spread around x=y=0.
Moreover, I suggest to assume any distribution of current I(r) (total current within radius r).
That leads to a magnetic field H = I(r)/(2 ∏ r) eΘ .
Replacing r as a function of (x,y,z) and taking the curl on Wolfram Alpha will help you understand what happens.

The clue is that with a continuous function I(r), the curl will give you the current density j = I'/(2πr) .

The reason why you got zero, is obviously because the derivation on Wolfram Alpha applies only on the domain of continuous functions. But you magnetic field is singular in x=y=0.

Have a check!
Simply paste this on Wolfram Alpha:

curl ( I(Sqrt(x^2+y^2)) (-y/(x^2+y^2), x/(x^2+y^2), 0) / (2 Pi) )

And analyze the result:

I'(sqrt(x^2+y^2)) / (2 pi sqrt(x^2+y^2)) e_z

=

I'(r) / (2 pi r)

You will recognize there the current density j.
Note also that, in the problem you wanted to solve, I'(r) is zero everywhere except in x=y=0.

If you already followed a course on the theory of distribution you could take for I a Gaussian distribution with a variable width w.
In the limit of w->0, you will verify that j=curl(H) will tend to the Dirac delta distribution.
 
Last edited:
Excellent answer, thank you

I did check, but the notation of i (r) threw me off a bit, I just assumed that we are talking about the air portion of the H.

so, maxwell's 4th equation in point form means: the rotating tendency of an Magnetic field (H) at a POINT = current density at THAT point plus if there are any changing E field.
that's why in my infinitesimally small current will produce curl(H) = 0 every where, a scenario not possible in the real world. But, it is good to know that H generated by current will have curl of zero in air. (not counting the displacement current business)
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top