Maxwell's 4th equation. BUT, curl of H is zero everywhere

  • Thread starter Thread starter ugenetic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curl Zero
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of Maxwell's 4th equation, focusing on the curl of the magnetic field H in relation to current density. Participants explore the implications of using Wolfram Alpha to analyze the curl of specific vector fields, noting that the curl of H outside a wire should be zero. It is emphasized that the current distribution I(r) must be continuous and not concentrated at a singular point for accurate results. The conversation highlights that the curl of H will yield a current density j, particularly when considering distributions like a Gaussian. Ultimately, the discussion clarifies that while the curl of H can be zero in air, this scenario is idealized and may not reflect real-world conditions.
ugenetic
Messages
49
Reaction score
3
please go to "Wolfram Alpha" website, (google the term) and copy paste the following formula:

curl ( (-y/(x^2+y^2), x/(x^2+y^2), 0)

you can see the result is zero

I think that's the expression of H surrounding a current. what am I missing?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Try this:

curl ( I(Sqrt(x^2+y^2)) (-y/(x^2+y^2), x/(x^2+y^2), 0) / (2 Pi) )

Where I(r) = I(Sqrt(x^2+y^2)) represents the current flowing within radius r.
 
I don't think your equation was correct. and I think curl of H outside of the wire SHOULD be zero. it should be I / Sqrt (x2 + y2) and x direction's expression should be -y/ sqrt(x2 + y2)
 
Can you provide more information regarding the question?
 
ugenetic said:
I don't think your equation was correct. and I think curl of H outside of the wire SHOULD be zero. it should be I / Sqrt (x2 + y2) and x direction's expression should be -y/ sqrt(x2 + y2)

My suggestion was to assume a current distribution I(r) that is not concentrated on x=y=0, but spread around x=y=0.
Moreover, I suggest to assume any distribution of current I(r) (total current within radius r).
That leads to a magnetic field H = I(r)/(2 ∏ r) eΘ .
Replacing r as a function of (x,y,z) and taking the curl on Wolfram Alpha will help you understand what happens.

The clue is that with a continuous function I(r), the curl will give you the current density j = I'/(2πr) .

The reason why you got zero, is obviously because the derivation on Wolfram Alpha applies only on the domain of continuous functions. But you magnetic field is singular in x=y=0.

Have a check!
Simply paste this on Wolfram Alpha:

curl ( I(Sqrt(x^2+y^2)) (-y/(x^2+y^2), x/(x^2+y^2), 0) / (2 Pi) )

And analyze the result:

I'(sqrt(x^2+y^2)) / (2 pi sqrt(x^2+y^2)) e_z

=

I'(r) / (2 pi r)

You will recognize there the current density j.
Note also that, in the problem you wanted to solve, I'(r) is zero everywhere except in x=y=0.

If you already followed a course on the theory of distribution you could take for I a Gaussian distribution with a variable width w.
In the limit of w->0, you will verify that j=curl(H) will tend to the Dirac delta distribution.
 
Last edited:
Excellent answer, thank you

I did check, but the notation of i (r) threw me off a bit, I just assumed that we are talking about the air portion of the H.

so, maxwell's 4th equation in point form means: the rotating tendency of an Magnetic field (H) at a POINT = current density at THAT point plus if there are any changing E field.
that's why in my infinitesimally small current will produce curl(H) = 0 every where, a scenario not possible in the real world. But, it is good to know that H generated by current will have curl of zero in air. (not counting the displacement current business)
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top