Graduate Measure of non-periodicity of almost periodic functions

Click For Summary
Almost periodic functions can be expressed as Fourier series with incommensurable frequencies, and a proposed integral criterion could measure their degree of non-periodicity. This criterion suggests that the integral of an almost periodic function over its almost period differs from zero, providing a dimensionless quantity that characterizes non-periodicity. The evaluation of periodicity is contingent on the chosen limits for integration, as the Fourier transform relies on these conditions. In practical applications, this concept is often related to "jitter" in electronic signals, which is analyzed statistically and may involve assumptions about noise types. Understanding the spectral width of frequencies in a Fourier spectrum is crucial for interpreting almost periodic functions and their non-periodic characteristics.
reterty
Messages
30
Reaction score
2
As is well known, almost periodic functions can be represented as a Fourier series with incommensurable (non-multiple) frequencies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_periodic_function. It seems to me that I came up with an integral criterion for the degree of non-periodicity. The integral of a periodic function (not including the constant component of its Fourier series), with respect to the argument for the main period, is equal to zero. In the theory of almost periodic functions, the concept of an almost period is introduced. So, a similar integral of an almost periodic function for almost a period will be different from zero. Its value divided by this almost period and the largest of the amplitudes of the harmonics of the Fourier series will be a dimensionless quantity characterizing the degree of non-periodicity of this almost periodic function. Is my criterion correct and useful?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The problem with "almost periodic" is that those functions are essentially undefined with such a broad and simple description.

In general, you will have to define over what conditions and how you will do the evaluation. The Fourier transform assumes periodicity based on the limits you choose to integrate over. It can not tell you about any periodicity on the order of 1 day, if you only collect data for 1 minute. So, I think just defining your window and looking at the Fourier transform is the only thing we can do. Then for different circumstances, you'll get different spectral data out, which may still be hard to interpret.

In practice, this subject is most commonly described as "jitter" of electronic signals. It is an extremely well studied and hugely important subject. The treatment tends to be statistical in nature. People invariably end up making some (powerful) assumptions about the type of deviation, like "gaussian noise", for example, to allow them to analyze the more general cases. Do some searching about jitter for more information. IRL, we would look at the spectral width of the "almost periodic" frequency out of a Fourier series or spectrum analyzer. This is also called "phase noise".
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K