Measure of non-periodicity of almost periodic functions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the measurement of non-periodicity in almost periodic functions, specifically through an integral criterion proposed by the user. The criterion suggests that the integral of an almost periodic function over its almost period, divided by the largest amplitude of its Fourier series harmonics, quantifies its degree of non-periodicity. The conversation highlights the challenges in defining and evaluating almost periodic functions, emphasizing the importance of context in Fourier analysis. Additionally, the topic of jitter in electronic signals is mentioned as a practical application of these concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier series and Fourier transforms
  • Knowledge of almost periodic functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of amplitude in signal processing
  • Basic principles of statistical analysis in signal evaluation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical properties of almost periodic functions
  • Study the application of Fourier transforms in signal processing
  • Learn about jitter and phase noise in electronic signals
  • Explore statistical methods for analyzing deviations in signal data
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, signal processing engineers, and researchers interested in the analysis of almost periodic functions and their applications in electronic signal evaluation.

reterty
Messages
30
Reaction score
2
As is well known, almost periodic functions can be represented as a Fourier series with incommensurable (non-multiple) frequencies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_periodic_function. It seems to me that I came up with an integral criterion for the degree of non-periodicity. The integral of a periodic function (not including the constant component of its Fourier series), with respect to the argument for the main period, is equal to zero. In the theory of almost periodic functions, the concept of an almost period is introduced. So, a similar integral of an almost periodic function for almost a period will be different from zero. Its value divided by this almost period and the largest of the amplitudes of the harmonics of the Fourier series will be a dimensionless quantity characterizing the degree of non-periodicity of this almost periodic function. Is my criterion correct and useful?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem with "almost periodic" is that those functions are essentially undefined with such a broad and simple description.

In general, you will have to define over what conditions and how you will do the evaluation. The Fourier transform assumes periodicity based on the limits you choose to integrate over. It can not tell you about any periodicity on the order of 1 day, if you only collect data for 1 minute. So, I think just defining your window and looking at the Fourier transform is the only thing we can do. Then for different circumstances, you'll get different spectral data out, which may still be hard to interpret.

In practice, this subject is most commonly described as "jitter" of electronic signals. It is an extremely well studied and hugely important subject. The treatment tends to be statistical in nature. People invariably end up making some (powerful) assumptions about the type of deviation, like "gaussian noise", for example, to allow them to analyze the more general cases. Do some searching about jitter for more information. IRL, we would look at the spectral width of the "almost periodic" frequency out of a Fourier series or spectrum analyzer. This is also called "phase noise".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K