Measuring Flow Velocity in Pipe Expansion: Laminar vs. Turbulent | Explained

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on measuring flow velocity in a pipe expansion scenario involving two pipes with diameters of 0.64 cm and 4.5 cm, and Reynolds numbers of 5000 and 700, respectively. The transition from a turbulent to a laminar flow is analyzed, emphasizing that despite the lower Reynolds number in the second pipe, turbulence may persist due to inlet conditions. The use of a hot wire anemometer is recommended for measuring velocity in turbulent flow, with the importance of averaging multiple measurements to obtain accurate mean velocity readings highlighted.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Reynolds number calculation in fluid dynamics
  • Familiarity with flow measurement techniques, specifically hot wire anemometry
  • Knowledge of laminar and turbulent flow characteristics
  • Basic principles of fluid mechanics and pipe flow dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of surface quality and external disturbances on flow characteristics
  • Learn about advanced flow measurement techniques beyond hot wire anemometry
  • Study methods for relaminarizing turbulent flow in pipe systems
  • Explore computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations for pipe flow analysis
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, fluid dynamics researchers, and technicians involved in flow measurement and analysis in piping systems will benefit from this discussion.

davidgrant23
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I have a double-barreled question for you all. So I have two pipes connected to each other. The first pipe is 0.64cm and has a Re = 5000, the second pipe is 4.5cm and has a Re = 700. The two are connected so that the gas expands from the the first pipe to the second.

Now, I wish to measure the flow velocity in the 2nd, larger diameter pipe. The Re I provided for the 2nd pipe suggests it is laminar, but I cannot simply place the air velocity meter right at the expansion between the two pipes as I would think it would be turbulent (expansion causing turbulence) right at the connection. My question is, is there a way of calculating how long along the length of the 2nd pipe I should place the velocity probe to ensure that the flow is laminar and not turbulent (from the expansion)?

Also, if in the event that the flow has to be turbulent, is measuring the velocity with a hot wire anemometer in turbulent flow just a case of taking a time averaged value, to negate the effect of turbulent fluctuations?

Thanks,
Dave
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
How did you determine the Reynolds numbers without measuring velocities?
 
gmax137 said:
How did you determine the Reynolds numbers without measuring velocities?

I know the volumetric flowrate from a flowmeter placed upstream of both. So all I do to get the Re is Re = 4Q/(πνD).
 
In pipe flow like this just because the Reynolds number is below about 2000 does not mean the flow will be laminar. That is just a general rule of thumb and depends on many things like the surface quality of the pipe, the presence of external disturbances and the inlet conditions. In your case the inlet conditions are probably turbulent so the flow in the second pipe is not likely to be laminar. I suppose the turbulence may decay eventually but again that really depends on many things. It is possible to relaminarize a turbulent flow if it is subjected to a sufficient strong favorable pressure gradient but that is not the case here.

The hotwire is capable of measuring the instantaneous velocity so if you take a sufficiently large number of measurements and average them you will get an accurate measurement of the mean velocity. The hotwire can also be use to determine whether your flow is laminar or turbulent.

Also keep in mind that with such a small pipe you are going to have to be very careful about the amount of blockage you introduce into the flow if you put a hotwire in the pipe. It can significantly interfere with your measurements.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
16K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
0
Views
2K