Measuring Hair Thickness (Young slits)

alonbab
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi,

We're doing an experiment of measuring the thickness of a hair using a laser.
So we took a hair, and a laser, and shot it through the hair, to receive the following pattern on the wall.

The image of what we received (after red filter applied) on the wall is attached.We're confused though, about what we're seeing.

We would like, ideally, to measure the distance between two fringes, which will allow us to determine the distance of the slit (which is the thickness of the hair in our case).
However, we see that the central lighted area is larger than the secondary lighted areas. We thought this might be explained by the Beat pattern (sinc^2 cos^2), so the main lighted area would be the central "shell" caused by the sinc, and within it we get so many fringes that we cannot see them, we just see constantly lighted area.

Is this true? How can we measure the distance of the hair, given that image?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • question.jpg
    question.jpg
    37.4 KB · Views: 437
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top