Measuring Mass Flow Rate of AlO2 Particles in Real-Time

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding a method to measure the real-time mass flow rate of small, abrasive AlO2 particles, averaging 50 microns in diameter, without obstructing the flow. Cavity Ringdown Spectroscopy (CRDS) was deemed unsuitable due to its focus on tracking smaller, slower particles, while a multi-pass optical cell is more aligned with exhaust gas analysis. Laser Doppler Anemometry (LDA) is being considered, although concerns about the need for tracer particles and calibration issues were raised. The supervisor is particularly interested in quantifying particle concentration in the flow, as the AlO2 particles tend to exit in clumps. The discussion concludes with a request for suggestions on easy-to-install devices that can provide instantaneous flow measurements.
NSX
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I've been asked to search for a way, cost isn't that big of an issue, to measure flow rate in real-time of small, fast, abrasive particles (AlO2). These particles are, on average, 50 microns in diameter, and are shot out of a nozzle, itself just a bit bigger than 50 microns.

Another requirement is that this detection system be non-invasive, i.e. it does not obstruct the flow itself.

So far, I've looked into using Cavity Ringdown Spectroscopy (CRDS), but it doesn't seem suitable because the method employed is tracking particles in the air, which are very small and very low speed.

I've also looked at a multi-pass optical cell, but that's more tailored towards analysis of exhaust gases and the like.

I'm currently looking at http://ej.iop.org/links/q08/Y7FohcpzMevEzI6PX7LwzQ/mst5_10_021.pdf [pdf], where they shoot light across the direction of the flow, and based on the attenuation, certain characteristics can be shown.

Any ideas on how to measure the mass flow rate of small AlO2 through a tube/nozzle?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Laser doppler anemometry?
 
brewnog said:
Laser doppler anemometry?



I'm currently reading about it, and so far it looks good!

My concern atm is that it says its been used for http://www.dantecdynamics.com/LDA/Princip/Index.html ...

I'll read into whether it can be used for small, particle flow.

Thanks!

[edit]

Actually, the ppt presentation they have on that site also says "Velocity of particles
", and it looks like tracer particles are needed to measure the velocity.

How nice: AlO2 are the size of their tracer particles! :D

I'll update you once I show my supervisor this.
 
Last edited:
Good stuff. Yeah, it's for fluid flow, but I was assuming that your particles would be suspended in air anyway. As far as I know, the seeding particles just need to be reflective, I don't think it matters too much what they actually are.

Let me know how it goes anyway!

How important is it to measure in real-time? High-speed video might be an easier option if it's viable.
 
brewnog said:
Let me know how it goes anyway!

How important is it to measure in real-time? High-speed video might be an easier option if it's viable.

Seems that they've tried LDA in the past, and there were issues in calibrating it and such.

In addition, my supervisor said that he's more interested in how concentrated the flow is, i.e. amount of particles flowing through a volume in the tube at anyone single time.

He wants this because it seems that the AlO2 comes out in clumps, i.e. many particles come out, then very little, then many, etc.
However, we want to have a way of quantifying this amount of flow at anyone time, hence, the opacimeter since the extinction coefficient is a measure of how much light is extinct => how many particles flow through.

Here's a picture of the setup:
https://my.ryerson.ca/bbcswebdav/users/m4yip/gt4/DSC07600.JPG

Is there any other device, preferably very easy to install and setup, that gives an instantaneous indication of how many particles are going through the tube?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top