Measuring the Polarisation of Light

Miss_Astro
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Maybe this is a trivial question, I'm not sure, but when you measure linearly polarised light, such as that in the CMB which component of the light is 'measured'.

By this I mean is it the oscillating electric field or the oscillating magnetic field that is oscillating in the direction of the polarising filter. Of course the E and B fields (not to be confused with E and B modes) cannot occur independently as it is an 'Electromagnetic wave' but as they are perpendicular the polarising filter can then only lie in the direction of the oscillations of one of the components.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarizer

If you are talking about Polaroid films, then you might be interested in the 6th paragraph in the section called "Absorptive polarizers"
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top