Mechanics question involving spring and hookes law.

ly667
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
My lamda value is 4.

What I have managed to get so far is:

dV/dx=-F

V=8/arctan(x/3)dx /=integrate sign!

integrate by parts

u=arctan(x/3), dv=dx
du=3/9+x^2dx, v=x

V=8/arctan(x/3)dx = 8[x.arctan(x/3)-/3x/9+x^2dx]

V= 8[x.arctan(x/3)-3/2log(9+x^2)+C]

Since V(0)=0

V= 8[x.arctan(x/3)-3/2log(9+x^2)+3/2log(9)]
V= 8[x.arctan(x/3)+3/2log(9/9+x^2)]


Not sure if this is correct, or where to go from here? Please help!
 

Attachments

  • mechanics question.jpg
    mechanics question.jpg
    36.3 KB · Views: 553
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi ly667. It looks like you are using the relation
Work Done = ∫F.dx = ∆K.E.[/size]​

and you will integrate between the limits of x=4 and x=0

I recommend that you get this written down at the start of the problem before you leap into the mechanics of problem solving, so that from the outset you can be confident of knowing precisely where you are headed. If you get into the habit of first laying down a good foundation, most of the time the solution will rise up almost Phoenix-like out of that foundation. :smile:

I'm not sure that your λ is 4, so let's keep it at λ.
V= 8[x.arctan(x/3)-3/2log(9+x^2)+C]
I don't quite get that. Can you do it again, this time keeping λ in the expression?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top