"Members of a frame are axially inextensible" implication?

AI Thread Summary
In frame analysis, the concept of "axially inextensible" members indicates that the length of the chord connecting member ends remains constant, even in a displaced condition. This principle applies to both vertical and inclined legs, suggesting that the distance between ends does not change regardless of the angle. The discussion raises questions about the implications of this property, particularly in relation to deflected frames and whether points in the deflected frame should align with original frame lines. Clarification is provided that maintaining inextensibility means the cumulative length along the member remains consistent with the original frame. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding axial behavior in structural analysis.
Ashu2912
Messages
106
Reaction score
1
In analysis of frames, we say that "The members of the frames are axially inextensible". In context of frames with vertical legs, what I understand is that the length of the chord joining the member ends in the displaced condition would be same in the axial direction. However, what does it imply in frames with inclined legs?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Ashu2912 said:
In analysis of frames, we say that "The members of the frames are axially inextensible". In context of frames with vertical legs, what I understand is that the length of the chord joining the member ends in the displaced condition would be same in the axial direction. However, what does it imply in frames with inclined legs?
Same thing. The distance between the ends doesn't change.

Chet
 
This is a diagram I found in "Structural Analysis" by Aslam Kassimalli. Here, if the member AC is inextensible, shouldn't the point c`in the deflected frame lie on the line CD in the original frame?
 

Attachments

  • pf frame doubt.png
    pf frame doubt.png
    4.6 KB · Views: 1,024
Ashu2912 said:
This is a diagram I found in "Structural Analysis" by Aslam Kassimalli. Here, if the member AC is inextensible, shouldn't the point c`in the deflected frame lie on the line CD in the original frame?
I don't think so. I think that all that is required for AC to be inextensible is that the cumulative length along the line AC be the same as in the original frame.

Chet
 
Ashu2912 said:
In analysis of frames, we say that "The members of the frames are axially inextensible". In context of frames with vertical legs, what I understand is that the length of the chord joining the member ends in the displaced condition would be same in the axial direction. However, what does it imply in frames with inclined legs?
" The members of the frames are axially inextensible". does that mean no axial deformation? Doesnt seem to be right..
 
lingesh said:
" The members of the frames are axially inextensible". does that mean no axial deformation? Doesnt seem to be right..
Pretty much.

All you've provided is a diagram. Is it being used in your text to help explain a certain mechanics topic, by chance?

Often, in explaining a certain point of mechanics or whatever, a simplified model is used initially to explain the concept. Once enough concepts are understood by the student, more complex (and more realistic) models can be analyzed and discussed in more complete detail.
 
Thread 'I need a concave mirror with a focal length length of 150 feet'
I need to cut down a 3 year old dead tree from top down so tree causes no damage with small pieces falling. I need a mirror with a focal length of 150 ft. 12" diameter to 36" diameter will work good but I can't think of any easy way to build it. Nothing like this for sale on Ebay. I have a 30" Fresnel lens that I use to burn stumps it works great. Tree service wants $2000.
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...
Back
Top