Mercury Seal Gap Size: Is it Possible?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physical properties of mercury, particularly in relation to its ability to escape through a small gap in a container. Participants explore theoretical scenarios involving a small container of mercury and the implications of gap size on its behavior, with considerations for practical applications in experiments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether mercury, given its high density and low surface adhesion, would be able to escape through a small 0.5mm gap in a container.
  • Another participant notes that while mercury may not drop through the gap if the container is not shaken, it could still pose a health risk due to evaporation at the surface.
  • A suggestion is made to seal the atmospheric end of the opening with ferrofluid or a similar material to prevent mercury escape.
  • There is curiosity about determining the largest gap size for a given weight and shape of mercury container, with one participant proposing simulation or analytic expression as methods for exploration.
  • A participant introduces the Washburn equation as a means to understand mercury porosimetry, providing a formula that relates pressure difference, surface tension, and pore radius.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the behavior of mercury in relation to small openings, with no consensus reached on the feasibility of mercury escaping through a gap or the implications of its properties.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the behavior of mercury under various conditions, the complexity of calculating gap sizes, and the dependence on specific physical properties such as surface tension and contact angle.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring fluid dynamics, material science, or practical applications involving mercury in experimental setups.

artis
Messages
1,479
Reaction score
977
I am wondering about the physical properties of mercury. I know that different materials have different density and ability to penetrate small openings. I wonder if I have a small container of mercury, say about 100 grams or less, and there is a small flat opening at the bottom of such container which can be adjusted. Given the gap is very small (say 0.5mm) and the mercury weight not large would the mercury be able to escape through the gap?
This is more of a theoretical idea than a practical one although if such gap could be made and sealed with some lubricant it could come in handy as a rotary electrical contact for some of my experiments later on which is partly why I'm asking.

I have a feeling that unlike water or diesel or other liquids that can easily seep through very small opening mercury's high density and very low surface adhesion and wetting would prevent it from seeping through a small opening in liquid form.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It wouldn't drop down if you don't shake the container but it will still evaporate at the surface, making that a health risk.
 
Well in theory the atmospheric end of the small opening could be sealed off by ferrofluid or a similar material.
I wonder is there any way of determining what is the largest gap size for any given weight and shape of container of mercury?
 
Sure. Simulate it. Or try to find an analytic expression for the total energy and look if it has a minimum.
 
I meant calculating the gap size, but I assume that would be complicated.
 
The Washburn equation is used in mercury porosimetry:
ΔPr = -2γcosθ
where ΔP is the pressure difference (usually just the pressure, as the sample is evacuated); r is the pore radius, γ is the surface tension of mercury and θ is the contact angle of the mercury with the solid. Using typical values of 140° for θ and 0.480 N/m for γ, we obtain
r = 0.736/ΔP
where r is in µm and ΔP in MPa
If r = 250 µm, ΔP = 2.9 kPa, corresponding to a mercury column of ca. 22 mm. A mercury layer deeper than this would go through the pores under its own weight.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nik_2213 and mfb

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
4K