Metal thin film adhesion, Au-Si deposition

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on achieving stable 100nm gold (Au) adhesion onto silicon (Si) substrates using electron beam evaporation. Participants recommend using a primer layer of either chromium (Cr) or titanium (Ti) at approximately 5nm thickness to enhance adhesion. The choice between Cr and Ti is debated, with Ti being favored for its biocompatibility in medical applications. Additionally, the discussion highlights the challenges of using germanium (Ge) as a substrate due to its less stable native oxide, but suggests that the same Cr or Ti protocols may apply for Au deposition on Ge.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electron beam evaporation techniques
  • Knowledge of thin film deposition protocols
  • Familiarity with the properties of Cr and Ti as adhesion layers
  • Basic concepts of substrate materials, specifically Si and Ge
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of Cr and Ti diffusion into Au at elevated temperatures
  • Investigate the use of platinum (Pt) as a diffusion barrier in metal thin films
  • Explore the adhesion properties of Au on Ge substrates
  • Study the biocompatibility of various adhesion layers in medical device applications
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and engineers in the fields of materials science, semiconductor fabrication, and biomedical device development will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on metal thin film adhesion techniques.

minerva
Messages
92
Reaction score
6
What protocol should I use to get a good stable 100nm Au adhesion onto a Si substrate using electron beam evaporation? I've heard talk of primer layers of either Cr or Ti at around 5nm thickness, as the typical way to do it.

Which material should I choose? What the advantages or disadvantages of both Cr and Ti (or some other material)? They're both commonly discussed and I don't know which one to pick. (I have both available for loading sources in the lab.) When other metals such as Al is used, onto Si, it will work well with no additional adhesion layer right?

What about if Ge is used as the substrate? I know the native oxide is significantly different on Ge, it's less stable and can be soluble, compared to native SiO2. I've heard that Ge itself adheres to things well and can be used as an adhesion layer. If Ge was used as the underlying substrate (same Au deposition) could the same Cr or Ti protocol still be used (same as Si), to have confidence in reliable adhesion of the metal?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I've used both Cr and Ti as an adhesion layer for Au to Si. The Ti was used in the context of an implantable medical device—Ti was perceived to be more biocompatible. One factor is that the adhesion layer inevitably diffuses somewhat into the Au, especially at higher temperatures, which can change the layer's resistivity, among other properties. However, I never did any rigorous tests to see whether Cr or Ti is worse in this respect. Some people insert Pt to block this diffusion. But really, the choice of Cr or Ti is a very small decision as long as your device is working correctly.

I haven't put Al on Si or worked with Ge, sorry.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K