Minimum Angle for Increasing Distance of Projectile?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hashiramasenju
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Projectile
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the minimum angle to the vertical for a projectile to ensure that its distance from the release point is consistently increasing. Participants explore the use of Pythagorean theorem and derivatives to analyze the distance function, R, and its behavior over time. There is mention of alternative methods, including pattern recognition and graphing software, to simplify the problem. Some participants suggest angles like 45 degrees and 35.26 degrees, while others calculate values around 20 degrees. The consensus emphasizes the importance of ensuring that the derivative of distance remains positive for the duration of the projectile's flight.
Hashiramasenju
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



whats the minimum angles to the vertical(theta) for a projectile(ball) to be realeased with speed v such that at any point of time the distance to the ball is increasing.

Homework Equations



Sh=vtsin(theta)
Sv=vtcos(theta)-0.5gt^2

The Attempt at a Solution


so i used pythagoras theorum to find the square of the distance to the projectile(R). thus d(R^2)/dt>0 because the distance to the ball from the origin(start point) must be increasing. But the algebra gets really nasty. Is there any alternative way or is there any error in my method
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that's pretty much it. You probably need a table of trig substitutions.
Don't forget you only need dR/dt > 0 for 0 < t < T (time of flight)... in fact, if R decreases at all, which part of the trajectory will that happen?

There are other methods... ie you can guess some values and look for a pattern, you can try using your understanding of parabolas to narrow your choice, use graphing software... etc.
 
Last edited:
Simon Bridge said:
No, that's pretty much it. You probably need a table of trig substitutions.
Don't forget you only need dR/dt > 0 for 0 < t < T (time of flight)... in fact, if R decreases at all, which part of the trajectory will that happen?

There are other methods... ie you can guess some values and look for a pattern, you can try using your understanding of parabolas to narrow your choice, use graphing software... etc.
Btw is the answer 45 deg
 
Simon Bridge said:
No, that's pretty much it. You probably need a table of trig substitutions.
Don't forget you only need dR/dt > 0 for 0 < t < T (time of flight)... in fact, if R decreases at all, which part of the trajectory will that happen?

There are other methods... ie you can guess some values and look for a pattern, you can try using your understanding of parabolas to narrow your choice, use graphing software... etc.
So is the answer 45 deg and 35.26
 
The question only requires one number for the answer.
I don't know the correct answer off the top of my head.
 
Hashiramasenju said:
So is the answer 45 deg and 35.26
I get something a bit less than 20° .
 
  • Like
Likes azizlwl
SammyS said:
I get something a bit less than 20° .
How did you get that ?
 
Hashiramasenju said:
How did you get that ?
I did what you set up as follows.
Hashiramasenju said:

The Attempt at a Solution


so i used pythagoras theorum to find the square of the distance to the projectile(R). thus d(R^2)/dt>0 because the distance to the ball from the origin(start point) must be increasing. But the algebra gets really nasty. Is there any alternative way or is there any error in my method
Thanks
R2 = Sh2 + Sv2 is not as difficult to deal with as it might at first appear to be. R2 is a degree 4 polynomial in t, but the constant term and the linear term are bot zero. Its derivative is a cubic polynomial in t, with a constant term of 0, so that one of the zeros is t=0, and you can use the quadratic formula for the other two zeros.

All that is needed is that the derivative is never zero, except perhaps at t = 0. Simply check the discriminant to determine those conditions.
 
Back
Top