Minimum angular velocity of a point mass on a rotating rod

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rob2024
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In a frictionless system with a massless rod, both angular momentum and energy are conserved as a point mass falls. The tension in the rod plays a crucial role in determining the motion of the mass, leading to confusion about its direction. The point mass cannot exert a horizontal force on the rod, resulting in a constant horizontal velocity until the rod is horizontal. The discussion raises questions about the trajectory of the mass and the definition of "minimum angular speed," suggesting it refers to the angular velocity about the vertical rod. Clarification on these concepts is needed for a complete understanding of the dynamics involved.
Rob2024
Messages
37
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
A point mass ##m## is moving on a circular horizontal path attached to a massless rod length ##l=50## cm. The other
end of the rod is attached to the pivot point ##O## on a infinitely long vertical rod. There is no friction
along the vertical rod.

When ##O## is held motionless, the rod makes an angle 20##^\circ## with the vertical direction.

If the pivot point ##O## is released and it falls on the rod without friction. What's the minimum angular speed of the mass during the subsequent motion?
Relevant Equations
Coonservation of angular momentum
Conservation of energy
Because the system has no friction, when the point mass falls, I think both angular momentum and energy are conserved. Further because the rod is massless, there cannot be a vertical force from mass on the rod. The difficulty is to determine the property of tension. It determines the subsequent motion of the point mass. I am not too sure where to go from here, It seems odd the tension in the rod is not along the rod. Is this a bad question?

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What can the net torque on the angled rod be? What does that tell you about the forces between the two rods?
 
hmm there cannot be any net torque either, this implies the point mass cannot exert horizontal force on the rod. This means the point mass travels at constant horizontal velocity until the rod becomes horizontal. I think I see what's happening.
 
Rob2024 said:
hmm there cannot be any net torque either, this implies the point mass cannot exert horizontal force on the rod. This means the point mass travels at constant horizontal velocity until the rod becomes horizontal. I think I see what's happening.
What about gravity? Or did you just mean its horizontal component is constant?
 
haruspex said:
What about gravity? Or did you just mean its horizontal component is constant?
The component.
 
Rob2024 said:
The component.
Ok.
So what will be the trajectory of the mass, and up to what point?
The question asks for the "minimum angular speed". It’s not clear to me how they are defining that. I assume they mean "the minimum magnitude of the angular velocity about the vertical rod", whereas taking it literally you'd have to consider the curve of the path in 3D.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top