Minimum Barge Length for Forced Plane Landing

AI Thread Summary
A 1000 kg plane attempting a forced landing on a 2000 kg barge must stop safely on the deck, which is affected by a constant frictional force equal to 1/4 of the plane's weight. The plane touches down at 50 m/s, and calculations reveal that the minimum length of the barge needed for a safe stop is 340 meters. The initial momentum of the plane is transferred to the barge, which moves together with the plane after landing. Misunderstandings in the momentum conservation equations led to confusion about the final velocities and the mass of the system. Correctly applying these principles clarifies the calculations and confirms the required barge length.
richievuong
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
A 1000kg plane is trying to make a forced landing on the deck of a 2000 kg barge at rest on the surface of a calm sea. The only frictional force to consider is between the plane's wheels and the deck, and this braking force is constant and equal to 1/4 of the plane's weight What must the minimum length of the barge be, in order that the plane can stop safely on the deck, if the plane touches down at the rear end of the deck with a velocity of 50m/s towards the front of the barge?

My work:

m1 = 1000kg
m2 = 2000kg
Ff = 1/4Fg
V1' = V2'

Fg = mg
=(1000)(9.81)
=9810N

Ff = 1/4Fg
= 1/4(9810)
=2452.5N

Fnet=Ff

P1(plane) = mv
= (1000)(50)
= 50000

P2(plane) = mv
= (1000)(0)
= 0

deltaP = (Fnet)t
50000 = 2452.5t
t = 20.387s

m1v1 + m2v2 = m1v1' + m2v2'
(1000)(50) + 2000(0) = 0 + (3000)v2'
50000 = 3000v2'
v2' = 16.667 m/s

a = V2-V1 / T
= (16.667-50) / 20.387
= -1.635m/s²

d = v1t + 1/2at²
= (50)(20.387) + 1/2(-1.635)(20.387)²
= 1019.35 - 339.777
=679.573m

Thats what i did but the answer is 340m...wondering what I did wrong...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
richievuong said:
My work:

P2(plane) = mv
= (1000)(0) <== First mistake I see. It contradicts what follows.
= 0

deltaP = (Fnet)t
50000 = 2452.5t
t = 20.387s

m1v1 + m2v2 = m1v1' + m2v2'
(1000)(50) + 2000(0) = 0 + (3000)v2' <== What are you really saying here?
50000 = 3000v2'
v2' = 16.667 m/s <== What does this tell you?

Thats what i did but the answer is 340m...wondering what I did wrong...
See the annotations in the quote.
 
i'm saying that the final velocity of the barge+plane which is 3000kg would be 16.667m/s by using the conservation of momentum equation...

m1v1' would be 0 because the plane loses all momentum and transfers it to the barge right? if not please clarify because I'm starting to get confused...

i don't really understand why the first part is wrong can you explain that also? thanks
 
richievuong said:
i'm saying that the final velocity of the barge+plane which is 3000kg would be 16.667m/s by using the conservation of momentum equation...

m1v1' would be 0 because the plane loses all momentum and transfers it to the barge right? if not please clarify because I'm starting to get confused...

i don't really understand why the first part is wrong can you explain that also? thanks

See the annotations in the following quote from your earlier post.

richievuong said:
m1v1 + m2v2 = m1v1' + m2v2' <== this is correct

(1000)(50) + 2000(0) = 0 + (3000)v2' <== this 0 suggests that v1' is zero and that m2 has changed to 3000kg. From what you did earlier, and from what you said in the most recent post, it appears that you really believe v1' is zero. It is not. And m2 does not change. What is true is that v1' = v2'; m1 and m2 have the same final velocity.

50000 = 3000v2' <== because m1v1 + 0 = (m1+m2)v2'

v1' = v2' = 16.667 m/s <== The final velocities are the same.
You need to use this v1' result in your earlier calculation. v1' is not zero. The final momentum of the plane is not zero.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top