Minimum possible kinetic energy in an interaction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the minimum possible kinetic energy after a collision between two objects with different masses and velocities. The initial momentum of the system is calculated using the formula M1V1o + M2V2o, leading to a combined velocity of 10.89 m/s. The kinetic energy is then computed using the formula KE = 0.5(m)(v^2), resulting in an initial calculation of 1067 J. However, the correct minimum kinetic energy after a completely inelastic collision is identified as 534 J, highlighting the importance of considering momentum as a vector. The user acknowledges a prior misunderstanding regarding the initial conditions of the second object.
Neutrinogun
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Object A of mass 10 kg moving at 10 m/s [E] interacts with (but does not touch) Object B of mass 8 kg moving at 12 m/s [N]. What is the minimum possible kinetic energy of the system after the collision?


Homework Equations


M1V1o + M2V2o = M1V1f + M2V2f
KE = (.5)(m)(v2)
Kinetic energy is minimized in a completely inelastic collision.


The Attempt at a Solution



10(10) + 8(12) = (10 + 8)v
v = 10.89 m/s
KE = (.5)(10)(10.89)2 + (.5)(8)(10.89)2
KE = 1067 J
Correct answer: 534 J (which is one-half of the answer I got.)

Help please?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Realize that momentum is a vector and must be added as such. (One momentum points east and the other points north. Find their correct vector sum.)
 
Oh...Thanks! Previous problems like this had the second object initially at rest, so I used that way without thinking.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Potential and Kinetic energy equations including drag coefficient
Replies
1
Views
1K
Work done during a collision -- Change in Kinetic Energy & change in Momentum
Replies
1
Views
2K
Finding the final speed of a space probe using work and kinetic energy
Replies
7
Views
2K
How Is Potential Energy Converted to Kinetic Energy in Physical Systems?
Replies
6
Views
1K
Confused about a conservation of energy problem
Replies
4
Views
2K
Kinetic Energy of Colliding Protons
2
Replies
54
Views
10K
Kinetic Energy / Potential Energy / Total Energy question
Replies
14
Views
2K
1D Particle & Energy w/ F(x): Am I doing this right?
Replies
7
Views
1K
Using Orbital Energy to Calculate Velocity
Replies
3
Views
1K
Kinetic energy and momentum of two satellites colliding
Replies
8
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top