Minimum Pulley Diameter for 1.5mm Bike Brake Cable

  • Thread starter Thread starter KevD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diameter Pulley
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the minimum pulley diameter suitable for a 1.5mm bike brake cable to ensure it can make a 180-degree turn without kinking. Participants emphasize the importance of the pulley design, particularly whether it has a groove or edge to accommodate the cable. It's suggested that the flexibility of the cable material plays a significant role in this determination. Testing the cable around progressively smaller pulleys is recommended to find the threshold at which kinking occurs. Ultimately, the goal is to identify the smallest practical pulley diameter for optimal performance.
KevD
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Using normal 1.5mm diameter bike brake cable, what would be the smallest possible pulley i could use to make a 180 degree direction change with the cable without kinking or distorting the cable?/?

Any help with this would be VERY helpful!

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How is you pulley, Does it has soe edge to balance the string or is it a flat surface. Well if its in the former way, then the radius of the pulley must be enough to sustain the diameter of the string and similarly the thickness of the pulley must be enough to hold the dimeter of the string. I think I have properly imagined about the structure you need.
 
Yes there will be an edge or a groove on the pulley for the cable to rest in. This will be with a steel cable though (bicycle brake cable) and the cable must travel half way around the pulley without kinking. The pulley needs to be as small as possible for the application. I need to know the smallest pulley diameter i can use without kinking the cable.

Thanks very much!
 
Anyone??!
 
Doesn't this depend on the flexibility of the metal used in the cable? Unless this is a question of theoretical metallurgy, you can always test the cable in question around progressively smaller cylindrical objects until a kink appears.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top