- #1

- 678

- 4

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter foo9008
- Start date

- #1

- 678

- 4

- #2

SteamKing

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 12,798

- 1,670

The graphic talks about head loss due to a sudden contraction.## Homework Statement

why the minor loss due to sudden expansion is given by formula of [( v_c - v_2) ^2 ]/ 2g ?

## Homework Equations

## The Attempt at a Solution

can it be [( v_2 - v_1) ^2 ]/ 2g ?

The velocity vc is important because it represents the greatest velocity to which the fluid is accelerated as it passes thru the sudden contraction, and consequently, in the zone between station c and station 2 is where the greater amount of head loss occurs. Very little loss occurs in the zone between station 1 and station c.

For more information:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borda–Carnot_equation

- #3

- 678

- 4

from the link , i can undertstand the gretest amount of energy lost at region c , can the formula be [( v_c - v_1) ^2 ]/ 2g ? how do u know that teh energy loss between c and 2 is greater than the energy loss at (1 and c) ???The graphic talks about head loss due to a sudden contraction.

The velocity vc is important because it represents the greatest velocity to which the fluid is accelerated as it passes thru the sudden contraction, and consequently, in the zone between station c and station 2 is where the greater amount of head loss occurs. Very little loss occurs in the zone between station 1 and station c.

For more information:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borda–Carnot_equation

Last edited:

- #4

SteamKing

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 12,798

- 1,670

From the velocities. V1 < Vc and Vc > V2, based on the continuity equation. Plus, that's what the wiki article says.from the link , i can undertstand the gretest amount of energy lost at region c , can the formula be [( v_c - v_1) ^2 ]/ 2g ? how do u know that teh energy loss between c and 2 is greater than the energy loss at (1 and c) ???

- #5

- 678

- 4

Can you explain further??From the velocities. V1 < Vc and Vc > V2, based on the continuity equation. Plus, that's what the wiki article says.

- #6

SteamKing

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 12,798

- 1,670

What's not clear about "That's what the wiki article says"?Can you explain further??

- #7

- 678

- 4

It didn't explain why the calculation can't involve vc and v1??

- #8

SteamKing

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 12,798

- 1,670

To recap:

"There is not much head loss between cross section 1, before the contraction, and cross section 3, the vena contracta at which the main flow is contracted most. But there are substantial losses in the flow expansion from cross section 3 to 2."

In other words, the loss between v1 and vc is negligible compared to the loss between vc and v2. Since head loss is proportional to velocity squared, the loss caused by the difference in vc and v2 must be based on those two velocities, not on v1 and vc.

- #9

- 678

- 4

To recap:

"There is not much head loss between cross section 1, before the contraction, and cross section 3, the vena contracta at which the main flow is contracted most. But there are substantial losses in the flow expansion from cross section 3 to 2."

In other words, the loss between v1 and vc is negligible compared to the loss between vc and v2. Since head loss is proportional to velocity squared, the loss caused by the difference in vc and v2 must be based on those two velocities, not on v1 and vc.

Share: