1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Minor loss due to sudden expansion

  1. Apr 24, 2016 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    why the minor loss due to sudden expansion is given by formula of [( v_c - v_2) ^2 ]/ 2g ?

    2. Relevant equations


    3. The attempt at a solution
    can it be [( v_2 - v_1) ^2 ]/ 2g ?
     

    Attached Files:

  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 24, 2016 #2

    SteamKing

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    The graphic talks about head loss due to a sudden contraction.

    The velocity vc is important because it represents the greatest velocity to which the fluid is accelerated as it passes thru the sudden contraction, and consequently, in the zone between station c and station 2 is where the greater amount of head loss occurs. Very little loss occurs in the zone between station 1 and station c.

    For more information:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borda–Carnot_equation
     
  4. Apr 25, 2016 #3
    from the link , i can undertstand the gretest amount of energy lost at region c , can the formula be [( v_c - v_1) ^2 ]/ 2g ? how do u know that teh energy loss between c and 2 is greater than the energy loss at (1 and c) ???
     
    Last edited: Apr 25, 2016
  5. Apr 25, 2016 #4

    SteamKing

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    From the velocities. V1 < Vc and Vc > V2, based on the continuity equation. Plus, that's what the wiki article says. :smile::wink:
     
  6. Apr 25, 2016 #5
    Can you explain further??
     
  7. Apr 25, 2016 #6

    SteamKing

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    What's not clear about "That's what the wiki article says"?
     
  8. Apr 25, 2016 #7
     
  9. Apr 25, 2016 #8

    SteamKing

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Sure it did. You just don't want to accept it, for some reason.

    To recap:
    "There is not much head loss between cross section 1, before the contraction, and cross section 3, the vena contracta at which the main flow is contracted most. But there are substantial losses in the flow expansion from cross section 3 to 2."

    In other words, the loss between v1 and vc is negligible compared to the loss between vc and v2. Since head loss is proportional to velocity squared, the loss caused by the difference in vc and v2 must be based on those two velocities, not on v1 and vc.
     
  10. Apr 25, 2016 #9
    noted
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Minor loss due to sudden expansion
Loading...