Distance of Image from Object in Plane Mirror - Caution with Convex Mirrors

  • Thread starter Thread starter louie3006
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mirror Reflection
AI Thread Summary
In a scenario involving a plane mirror, an observer located 3 meters from an object that is 2 meters in front of the mirror will perceive the image at a distance of 4 meters. Convex mirrors, commonly used in vehicles, produce images that appear closer than the actual object. This is due to the smaller angle subtended by the image compared to the object, leading to a misperception of distance. The cautionary message on convex mirrors warns users that objects may appear farther away than they truly are. Understanding these principles is crucial for safe navigation when using convex mirrors.
louie3006
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Q#1. Homework Statement [/b]
an object and an observer are located 2meter in front of a plane mirror, If the observer is 3meter from the object, find the distance between the observer and the location of the object's image.

Q#2. the image produced by a convex mirror is always closer to the mirror than the object. Then why is it that the convex mirror used on cars often say "caution: objects are closer than they appear" printed on them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Q#2 Angle subtended by an object to the eyes of an observer is small if the object is away from him. In the convex mirror angle subtended by the image is smaller than the angle subtended by the object ,if he see the object behind him directly. So, if the observer is ignorant about the nature of the convex mirror and assumes it as plain morror, then to him the object appears to be at a larger distance than the actual distance. Hence the caution.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top