Misc. Conceptuals (Magnetism+Electric Field+ Rotational motion)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses several conceptual questions in physics related to magnetism, electric fields, and rotational motion. It explores whether a magnet can have three poles, with a note on faulty magnetization potentially leading to multiple poles. The circular magnetic field generated by a straight current is linked to Ampere's circuital law. In rotational motion, it is clarified that tangential acceleration is not constant, while angular acceleration remains fixed. Lastly, the electric field intensity in a parallel plate capacitor is discussed, with suggestions to use Gauss's law or the voltage formula, while also noting the confusion about the applicability of Gauss's law in this context.
shrabastee
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Here are a couple of questions I'm having trouble with.

1) Can a magnet have 3 poles?
[Note: I've been told that a magnet might develop two north poles at the centre and two south poles at either end if it is faultily magnetised, but I'd much appreciate some explanation=)]

2) If the current through a conductor is straight, the magnetic field it develops is circular. Explain.
[Note: Is this because of ampere's circuital law?]

3)In rotational motion, which of the following quantities remains fixed and why?
a. Tangential acceleration
b. Angular acceleration
[Note: I dunno!]

4)In a parallel plate capacitor, a potential of 100 volt is applied between the ends. One plate in positively charged, while the other is earthed. What will be the electric field intensity at any point between the plates?
[Note: The intensity's supposed to be the same at any point between the plates, but how do I calculate the intensity if the distance between the plates and charge density aren't given?! But then again, does intensity depend on the distance between the plates at all? Because if it did, it WOULDN'T be the same at all points. I'm confused!]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't help you without giving you the answers so I'm just going to give you the areas that you should go read back up on in one of your textbooks

1)magnetism
2)right hand rule
3)centripetal acceleration
if you quickly read up on these areas you'll find your answers easy
 
For question 3 it is the tangential acceleration that is not constant. This acceleration is perpendicular to the force vector that points inwards towards the centre of the circle. So it is constantly changing direction as the object rotates.

For question 4 can't you just gauss's law to calculate the field?

\ointE.da = \sigmaA/Eo

Or it might be that you can use E = -\DeltaV
 
vorcil said:
I can't help you without giving you the answers so I'm just going to give you the areas that you should go read back up on in one of your textbooks

1)magnetism
2)right hand rule
3)centripetal acceleration
if you quickly read up on these areas you'll find your answers easy

Thanks! I did try looking them up before I posted, though :). Could you at least tell me if the guesses I made are correct, or on the right track? I'd much appreciate it. :) Also, the last question is freaking me out!
 
Kalvarin said:
For question 3 it is the tangential acceleration that is not constant. This acceleration is perpendicular to the force vector that points inwards towards the centre of the circle. So it is constantly changing direction as the object rotates.

For question 4 can't you just gauss's law to calculate the field?

\ointE.da = \sigmaA/Eo

Or it might be that you can use E = -\DeltaV

Thanks, but I think Gauss is valid for closed surfaces, isn't it? If it's a parallel plate capacitor it isn't really enclosing any charge is it?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top