Mistake in Physics textbook equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a potential error in a textbook formula for calculating the final velocity in the vertical direction of a projectile. The original formula presented is vf = (vi)(sinx) - gt, which the user finds leads to incorrect answers. However, an alternative formula, vf = (vi)(sinx) - 1/2(gt), yields correct results. The conversation reveals that the confusion may stem from the definition of the angle θ, which is typically measured from the horizontal in projectile motion problems. The textbook's formula is deemed correct when the angle is appropriately defined, as it aligns with standard kinematic equations. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between altitude and vertical velocity, noting that taking the derivative of the altitude equation is necessary to derive the velocity formula. Overall, the user is encouraged to trust the textbook's equations while acknowledging that their current understanding may not include calculus concepts necessary for deeper comprehension.
goochmawn314
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
There is a formula in my textbook and I have a strong feeling it's incorrect.

The formula the book says is

velocity in y direction (final) = (vi)(sinx) - gt

Whenever I use this, I get all the answers wrong. However, if I use

(vi)(sinx) - 1/2(gt) .. I get them right.

Is this a misprint?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably not. It depends on how the angle is defined -- with respect to the horizontal, or with with respect to the vertical. These two definitions will affect whether the correct component is a sine or cosine of that particular angle.
 
You haven't given the context, but I can guess: This is the expression for the vertical component of velocity of an object hitting the ground for an object thrown with an initial velocity vi at an angle θ (measured with respect to horizontal).

If that's the case, your text is correct.
 
I think the textbook is right for the following reasons:
1. vf = vi + at and in your case, a = -g in y direction
2. s = (vi)*t + 1/2*g*(t^2), but the LHS of your equation is velocity and the power of t in your equation is 1.
 
Okay another equation in the book is

y = (vi)(sinx)(t) - 1/2(g)(t)^2 (unit here is meters)

If you divide out t on both sides you get meters over seconds and are left with (vi)(sinx) - 1/2gt

And meters/second is the unit for the original formula I posted. THe 1/2 is still there..
 
also: the angle is always with respect to the horizontal in these problems unless it's aviation (with bearings)
 
goochmawn314 said:
Okay another equation in the book is

y = (vi)(sinx)(t) - 1/2(g)(t)^2 (unit here is meters)

If you divide out t on both sides you get meters over seconds and are left with (vi)(sinx) - 1/2gt

And meters/second is the unit for the original formula I posted. THe 1/2 is still there..
The expression for altitude is correct. Your reasoning from that point on is incorrect. You need to take the derivative of the altitude to obtain the vertical component of velocity.

If you don't know what that means, you will eventually, but until then you'll have to take it for granted that the equations for altitude and the vertical component of velocity in your text are both correct.
 
Yeah the derivative is just gt isn't it.. Ok but in this course, there hasn't been any calculus yet. Thanks for your help
 

Similar threads

Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top