What MIT OCW courses can help clarify tensor concepts in physics?

AI Thread Summary
MIT OCW courses 8.01 and 8.012 provide foundational physics knowledge but may not cover tensors in depth. Tensors are typically introduced in mechanics courses and are crucial for understanding concepts in fluid dynamics and general relativity. A rank 2 tensor can be visualized as a vector of vectors, with its components representing complex relationships like momentum flux in fluids. The discussion emphasizes that many textbooks focus on tensors in curved space, which may not be suitable for beginners seeking practical applications in mechanics. Understanding basic vector operations is essential before delving into more complex tensor concepts.
3102
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am working through the MIT OCW courses 8.01 and 8.012. At my university we already learned about tensors in the first mechanics course but I don't really understand them completely.

Therefore I am searching for some MIT OCW course that covers tensors.
I'd be glad at any help.

Apart from that I've got some more questions:

1) When are tensors ordinarily covered in physics?

2) Could anyone give me some textbook recommendations for tensors?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When I was in school, tensors never really got covered as a dedicated subject. It just appeared from time to time, and we were more or less expected to just understand it. But it is typically covered in some detail in general relativity, which I never took. Most definitions of tensors revolve involve tensors in curved space, which is too complicated for someone who just wants to use tensors in mechanics. There are definitions which talk about how a tensor transforms under coordinate transformations. These definitions are mostly useless for your purposes. Since this is the majority of textbooks on tensors, I'm not going to recommend a textbook.

You know what a vector is right? A rank 2 tensor is simply a vector of vectors. A rank 3 tensor is a vector of vectors of vectors (or a vector of rank 2 tensors). Momentum is a vector. Now if you consider a fluid that carries momentum along with it, you can have a momentum flux. The fluid itself moves with some velocity, so you have a vector of vectors, or a rank 2 scalar. A vector in 3D has 3 components: vx, vy, vz. A rank 2 tensor in 3D also has three components, but each component is a vector, so there are 9 components total. It doesn't really matter if each fluid parcel carries only a little momentum and the fluid is moving fast, or each parcel carries a lot of momentum, and the fluid is slow; the momentum flux is the outer product of the fluid velocity and parcel momentum.

Often, you want to know the amount of a vector pointing in some direction. You would take the dot product of the vector and a surface normal (which looks like a vector but more properly should be called a covector), and you get a scalar (a rank 0 tensor). You can do the same for a rank 2 tensor, except that when you take the dot product of a rank 2 tensor with a covector you get a vector (a rank 1 tensor). You don't need to know all the stuff with contravariant and covariant vectors until you get into general relativity.
 
  • Like
Likes 3102
Thread 'Is there a white hole inside every black hole?'
This is what I am thinking. How much feasible is it? There is a white hole inside every black hole The white hole spits mass/energy out continuously The mass/energy that is spit out of a white hole drops back into it eventually. This is because of extreme space time curvature around the white hole Ironically this extreme space time curvature of the space around a white hole is caused by the huge mass/energy packed in the white hole Because of continuously spitting mass/energy which keeps...
Back
Top