Model Rocket Launch: Acceleration and Maximum Height Calculations

  • Thread starter Thread starter dorthod
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rocket
AI Thread Summary
The model rocket, with a mass of 0.4 kg, experiences an impulse of 22 N*s from its engine over 3 seconds, leading to an average acceleration of 8.53 m/s² after accounting for gravity. The initial calculations mistakenly used a mass of 4 kg, which was corrected during the discussion. After the engine cuts off, the rocket reaches a maximum height of approximately 71.84 meters and a final velocity of 25.6 m/s. The method used for calculations was validated, confirming the final answers. Overall, the corrected calculations align with the expected physics principles for model rocket launches.
dorthod
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Did I solve this correctly?

A 0.4-kg model rocket is launched straight upwards. Its engine provides an impulse of 22 N*s by firing for 3 seconds. What is the average acceleration of the rocket while the engine is firing, and what is the maximum height the rocket will reach?

J=Ft so 22=F(3) so F=7.33
F=ma so 7.33=4a so a=1.83
x=(1/2)at(squared) so x=(1/2)1.83(3)squared so x=8.25 meters
then the engines cut off
the final velocity = at so v=(1.83)(3) so v=5.5 m/s
then using v(squared)=v0(squared) + 2a(x-x0) to find the displacement at the top of the arch I get 0 = 5.5(squared) + 2(-9.8)(x-8.25) so x = 9.79m

My two answers would be 1.83 m/s(squared) and 9.79 meters, correct or not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your value for mass. It was given as .4Kg. You used 4Kg in your calculation.

Also, the acceleration of gravity is working in the opposite direction as the acceleration provided by the rocket motor.

other than that, your method seems fine.
 
Last edited:
doh, I'm an idiot. Using the same method as below, with .4 as the mass: So 7.33/.4 = 18.333 which is a, but minus gravity, the acceleration of the rocket is 8.53. That means it was at 38.4m and going 25.6 m/s when the engines cut off. Therefore it was 71.837 m high at the peak. Correct?
 
Don't be to hard on yourself. It's easy to forget things like that.

Your answers are correct, or at least they agree with mine.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top