Modeling bolt holes as stress concentrators in I beam bending

AI Thread Summary
Modeling bolt holes as stress concentrators in I-beams involves calculating the bending moment of inertia and using it to determine stress. The stress is calculated using the formula σ = Md/I, where M is the maximum moment and d is the distance from the centroid. When a bolt hole is introduced, the average stress can be calculated based on the flange dimensions and the hole's radius, leading to a maximum stress determined by a stress concentration factor K. The impact of bolt holes on beam strength depends on their geometry, location, and loading conditions, with proper preload not necessarily mitigating stress issues. Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is recommended for more accurate modeling, despite its own complexities.
foundry
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
curious as to the proper way to model this.

beam is symmetric so centroid is in the middle (used to calculate distance from centroid d in bending moment of inertia equation)

bending moment of inertia is

I =\sum(I + Ad2)
I=\frac{1}{12}bh
b=base
h=height
d=distance of the area's center to total centroid
A=area of section

using max moment from a FBD the stress is calculated

σ = \frac{Md}{I}

say a bolt hole is placed on the top flange, to me it makes sense to model it this way...

take just the top flange use stress calculated from above equation to find the compressive load P via this equation and the cross sectional area of the flange A

σ = \frac{P}{A}

now modeling the hole as a stress concentrator

σaverage = \frac{P}{(w-2r)t}

w = width of flange
r = radius of hole
t = thickness of flange

calculate \frac{r}{w} in order to find a value for K (tabled value)

σmax = K σaverage

like I said this makes sense to be but when I run through a sample calculation a beam originally having a factor of safety of 2 ends up not being able to withstand the load just by introducing a bolt hole. thanks for your time.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I take it with the proper bolt preloading, these holes aren't an issue? Is that a correct assumption?
 
Their effect on the beam will depend largely on the geometry and their location on the flange. It could be as long as the holes are far from an edge that you can just consider them to be located in a plate in tension, in which case there are well-documented stress concentration factors to calculate their stress rise. It will also depend on your loading conditions, but I wouldn't assume proper preload on a bolt in the hole will solve your problem.

Otherwise your best bet is FEA, but it brings its own set of limitations and challeges. Interestingly, many stress concentration factors (e.g. Peterson's Stress Concentration Factors) are calculated using parametric FEA models and curve fits to their outputs.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top