Geometry Modern Differential Geometry Textbook Recommendation

AI Thread Summary
Recommendations for modern introductory textbooks on differential geometry for physicists include Chris Isham's "Modern Diff Geometry for Physicists," though it may be terse for self-study. Theodore Frankel's "Geometry of Physics" is highly regarded for its comprehensiveness and leisurely pace, making it suitable for learners. "Geometry, Topology, and Physics" by Nakahara is considered a standard text in the field. Marian Fecko's "Differential Geometry and Lie Groups for Physicists" is noted for its hands-on approach with numerous exercises, appealing to some readers. The discussion emphasizes the importance of pedagogical structure, particularly the separation of (semi)Riemannian geometry from bundle theory in teaching differential geometry.
kay bei
Messages
21
Reaction score
5
Could you provide recommendations for a good modern introductory textbook on differential geometry, geared towards physicists. I know physicists and mathematicians do mathematics differently and I would like to see how it is done by a physicists standard. I have heard Chris Ishams “Modern Diff Geometry for Physicists” is good in this respect but I don’t know how modern or at what level this is at. Theodore Frankels Geometry of Physics is mentioned a lot and highly regarded as being the most complete and comprehensive. I would like to get your opinions on what textbooks you think will be leading the way forward in physics classes on Diff Geom for Physicists?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kay bei said:
I would like to get your opinions on what textbooks you think will be leading the way forward in physics classes on Diff Geom for Physicists?

This is highly subjective, i.e., it is highly dependent on the course and instructor. For example, even though everything can be treated in the context of bundles, I think that (semi)Riemannian geometry should be separated out from the material on bundles. I think this for two reasons: 1) this is pedagogically better; 2) this is the way differential geometry underlying general relativity (semi-Riemannian) and gauge field theories (bundles) traditionally is treated. Of the books I mention below, Fecko, Nakahara, and Frankel all do this, while Isham doesn't.

I quite like Isham's book, but it might be a bit terse for self-study. Frankel proceeds at (I think) at a slightly more leisurely pace.

"Geometry, Topology, and Physics" by Nakahara is possibly the most standard text.

Folks here know that I am a big fan of "Differential Geometry and Lie Groups for Physicists" by Marian Fecko.

Fecko has an unusual format. From its Preface,
A specific feature of this book is its strong emphasis on developing the general theory through a large number of simple exercises (more than a thousand of them), in which the reader analyzes "in a hands-on fashion" various details of a "theory" as well as plenty of concrete examples (the proof of the pudding is in the eating).

I have found that this format works well for me, but other folks might have different opinions, though I know that some others here at PF also like Fecko.

Fecko is reviewed at the Canadian Association of Physicists website,

http://www.cap.ca/BRMS/Reviews/Rev857_554.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes TurboDiesel, weirdoguy and vanhees71
Thanks George, I appreciate your feedback. What do you mean by everything can be treated with bundles? Are bundles a kind of unifying mathematical tool? Do any of the books above take the approach to bundles?
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
This thread only works as a summary from the original source: List of STEM Masterworks in Physics, Mechanics, Electrodynamics... The original thread got very long and somewhat hard to read so I have compiled the recommendations from that thread in an online (Google Drive) spreadsheet. SUMMARY Permits are granted so you can make comments on the spreadsheet but I'll initially be the only one capable of edition. This is to avoid the possibility of someone deleting everything either by mistake...
By looking around, it seems like Dr. Hassani's books are great for studying "mathematical methods for the physicist/engineer." One is for the beginner physicist [Mathematical Methods: For Students of Physics and Related Fields] and the other is [Mathematical Physics: A Modern Introduction to Its Foundations] for the advanced undergraduate / grad student. I'm a sophomore undergrad and I have taken up the standard calculus sequence (~3sems) and ODEs. I want to self study ahead in mathematics...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
9K
Replies
34
Views
7K
Back
Top