Modes and Q-factor(s) of a random laser

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Q-factor of random lasers, specifically addressing whether multiple peaks in the emission spectrum correspond to unique lasing modes or represent a single mode. Participants debated the appropriate method for calculating the Q-factor, questioning whether to use the wavelength at Peak1 divided by the FWHM at the blue line or the red line. It was concluded that the Q-factor is not well-defined for complex systems with multiple peaks and may require a detailed model to accurately describe the behavior of the system, potentially treating each peak with its own wavelength and Q-factor.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Q-factor in laser physics
  • Familiarity with random laser mechanisms
  • Knowledge of FWHM (Full Width at Half Maximum) calculations
  • Experience with spectral analysis of laser emissions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for calculating Q-factor in complex laser systems
  • Explore detailed models for random laser behavior
  • Study the implications of multiple lasing modes in random lasers
  • Examine the paper "Random Lasing with a High Quality Factor over the Whole Visible Range Based on Cascade Energy Transfer" for practical examples
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in photonics, laser physicists, and graduate students studying random lasers and their Q-factors will benefit from this discussion.

samchan
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Many papers about random lasers mention the Q-factor of random lasers. Since a random laser has multiple peaks close to each other like shown in the figure. Does each of these peaks correspond to a unique random lasing mode, or is it just a single mode?
244799


Similarly what is the right way to calculate the Q-factor of this random laser (example plot shown below) : Should it be wavelength at Peak1 divided by FWHM at (blue line) or wavelength of Peak1 divided by FWHM at (red line) ?

244800


Should the Q-factor be calculated at -3db or FWHM?
 
Science news on Phys.org
IMO, Q is only well defined for simple oscillators. I'm not sure that there is a way to describe two response peaks with one value. You will probably have to explain to people what is going on with more words or a more detailed model. Perhaps as the sum of two peaks each with their own λ and Q?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: samchan
DaveE said:
IMO, Q is only well defined for simple oscillators. I'm not sure that there is a way to describe two response peaks with one value. You will probably have to explain to people what is going on with more words or a more detailed model. Perhaps as the sum of two peaks each with their own λ and Q?

I saw another paper, where they calculate Q-factor for isolated peaks in a random laser. Below is a picture from a paper titled : Random Lasing with a High Quality Factor over the Whole Visible Range Based on Cascade Energy Transfer. They measure bandwidth of 0.05nm at FWHM.
244836
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K