Modes and Q-factor(s) of a random laser

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Q-factor of random lasers, questioning whether multiple peaks in the emission spectrum correspond to unique lasing modes or represent a single mode. Participants debate the correct method for calculating the Q-factor, considering whether to use the wavelength at Peak1 divided by the FWHM of the blue or red line. There is skepticism about defining Q for systems with multiple peaks, suggesting that each peak may require its own Q-factor and wavelength for accurate representation. A reference is made to a paper that successfully calculates the Q-factor for isolated peaks in random lasers, noting a bandwidth of 0.05nm at FWHM. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of modeling random lasers due to their multiple response peaks.
samchan
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Many papers about random lasers mention the Q-factor of random lasers. Since a random laser has multiple peaks close to each other like shown in the figure. Does each of these peaks correspond to a unique random lasing mode, or is it just a single mode?
244799


Similarly what is the right way to calculate the Q-factor of this random laser (example plot shown below) : Should it be wavelength at Peak1 divided by FWHM at (blue line) or wavelength of Peak1 divided by FWHM at (red line) ?

244800


Should the Q-factor be calculated at -3db or FWHM?
 
Science news on Phys.org
IMO, Q is only well defined for simple oscillators. I'm not sure that there is a way to describe two response peaks with one value. You will probably have to explain to people what is going on with more words or a more detailed model. Perhaps as the sum of two peaks each with their own λ and Q?
 
  • Like
Likes samchan
DaveE said:
IMO, Q is only well defined for simple oscillators. I'm not sure that there is a way to describe two response peaks with one value. You will probably have to explain to people what is going on with more words or a more detailed model. Perhaps as the sum of two peaks each with their own λ and Q?

I saw another paper, where they calculate Q-factor for isolated peaks in a random laser. Below is a picture from a paper titled : Random Lasing with a High Quality Factor over the Whole Visible Range Based on Cascade Energy Transfer. They measure bandwidth of 0.05nm at FWHM.
244836
 
Back
Top