Converting Moles of Iron to kg: Net Charge Calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter pat666
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ir Moles
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mass of iron from moles, where a user initially used the incorrect atomic mass of 192.22 u instead of the correct value for iron, which is approximately 55.85 u. The user calculated the mass as 480.55 g based on the wrong atomic mass, while the correct mass for 2.5 moles of iron should be around 139.6 g. Additionally, the net charge of the iron is questioned, specifically regarding the impact of one atom missing an electron. The conversation highlights the importance of using accurate atomic values in chemical calculations. Accurate knowledge of elemental symbols and their corresponding atomic masses is crucial for solving chemistry problems effectively.
pat666
Messages
703
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A piece of solid Iron contains 2.5moles of atoms. Whats its mass? suppose one atom in 10^12 were missing one electron, what would be the net charge of the iron?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


atomic mass 192.22u
so mass should be 2.5*192.22 = 480.55g but the answer is 139.6g. I suck at chem and don't have a clue where I went wrong?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So I did, what the element Ir then?
 
Why Ir? Read the text, it is about Iron.

ehild
 
Yeah I was thinking that Ir was Iron that's where I got the bad value from.
 
Ir is Iridium, Iron is Fe (Ferrum).

ehild
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top