Moment of Inertia of a drum with center axle

AI Thread Summary
To find the moment of inertia of a composite structure consisting of a hollow shell with discs at each end and a central shaft, calculate the moment of inertia for each component separately. Use the parallel axis theorem to account for the distance between the axes of the components. The total moment of inertia can be obtained by summing the individual moments of inertia. While both summing and treating it as a single body are valid approaches, the latter is more complex due to the welded nature of the structure. Therefore, summing the individual components is generally the simpler method.
aamir9
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am confused with how to find moment of inertia of composite example. Like a hollow shell having one disc at each end and a shaft in the centre. How to find out Moment of Inertia if Force is applied tangentially on the shell and if force is applied tangentially on the shaft. Should I sum up three Inertias after calculating separately or I should consider it as one body and calculate it according as a solid mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_axis_theorem"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
what about 2 discs fixed at the end of shell
 
Find the moment of inertia of each component (here two discs and the hollow sphere) along their principal axes and then use parallel axis theorem.

Do you have an image of the setup you're talking about? From what I am imagining your setup is, it looks like the shaft goes through the center of both discs, perpendicular to the plane of disc and through one of the diameters of the shell. If this is correct, total moment of inertia would simply be the sum of moment of inertia of individual components.
 
You understood correctly shaft is passing from the centre of the both discs perpendicularly and from the centre of the Hollow shell parallel to the axis of the shell and each disc is welded at the each end of the hollow shell.

Thanks
I understood what you mean just make it sure either summing up is solution or a one body calculation is proper way because it is a welded structure
 
aamir9 said:
I understood what you mean just make it sure either summing up is solution or a one body calculation is proper way because it is a welded structure

Both approaches will work, except that one body calculation will be much more complex. You're welcome :smile:
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top