Moment of Inertia of Cavendish pendulum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the moment of inertia for a Cavendish pendulum, initially using the formula I = 2(m r^2), which is appropriate for a dumbbell configuration. Participants clarify that the moment of inertia should also account for the suspension mechanism and the weights of the bar and wire. A revised formula is proposed, incorporating the moment of inertia for a rod rotating around its midpoint, resulting in a total moment of inertia calculation of approximately 13,137,851.84 cm² g. Diagrams from Cavendish's original paper are shared to illustrate the pendulum's geometry. The final consensus indicates that the calculations and considerations presented are on the right track.
Pioneer1
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to compute the moment of inertia of the Cavendish pendulum. I used

I = 2(m r^2)

r = gyration arm
m = the weight attached to the pendulum

But this formula is for a dumbell type of torsion pendulum where the weights are attached to the bar.

Does anyone know the formula for a pendulum where the weights are suspended as in the case of the Cavendish pendulum? I couldn't find it online.

With this formula I got

I = 2 ( 729.8 * 93.1^2) = 12,651,243.56 g cm^2

Does this sound right for a pendulum of this dimensions?

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pioneer1 said:
Does anyone know the formula for a pendulum where the weights are suspended as in the case of the Cavendish pendulum?

For the benefit of those of us who haven't been following your previous discussions closely, can you provide a diagram of the specific geometry that you have in mind, so we can see how it differs from Example 1 in the link you provided (which is the case where I = 2mr^2)?
 
jtbell said:
For the benefit of those of us who haven't been following your previous discussions closely, can you provide a diagram of the specific geometry that you have in mind, so we can see how it differs from Example 1 in the link you provided (which is the case where I = 2mr^2)?

Thanks for your reply. Here's the drawing from Cavendish's original paper:

http://www.alphysics.com/cavendishexperiment/CavendishSchematic11.jpg

And here's a detail

http://www.alphysics.com/cavendishexperiment/CavendishSchematic111.jpg

Cavendish also gave the weight of the bar and the silver wire he used to strengthen it. I assume those will have to be taken into consideration as well.
 
You've still got two masses revolving around a common central point, so their moment of inertia I is the same as when they're connected by a rod of negligible mass in a dumbbell configuration as in the page you first referenced. So you're OK so far.

What you need now is I for the rotating part of the suspension mechanism. You have the mass of the transverse rod, and I for a rod rotating transversely around its midpoint is a standard case. For some reason it's not on the page you first referenced, but you can find it on Hyperphysics:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mi.html#cmi

Just add the two I's together. In principle, you should also consider I for the rest of the rotating part of the apparatus, but the supporting wires are probably pretty light so you can safely neglect them, at least as a start in your analysis.
 
jtbell said:
Just add the two I's together. In principle, you should also consider I for the rest of the rotating part of the apparatus, but the supporting wires are probably pretty light so you can safely neglect them, at least as a start in your analysis.

Ok. Thanks. From hyperphysics I got 1/12 M L^2 and added it to the previous result:

I = 2 m r^2 + 1/12 M L^2

L = length of the rod
r = half length of the rod

So,

Total moment of inertia for the Cavendish experiment = r^2 (2m + 1/3M) = 13,137,851.84 cm2 g

m = weight of each ball = 729.8 g

M = Rod weight = 155.5 + 11 + 2.9 = 169.40 g (including deal rod, silver supporting wire, vernier attached to the arm)

L = Rod length = 73.3 inches = 186.18 cm

r = Half rod length = 93.09 cm

I also added another picture with a little more detail about the arm. (Figure 3 here.)

Does this look good?

Thanks again for your help.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
Back
Top